2012
DOI: 10.1177/1071181312561047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Temporal Regularity in Categorical Team Communication Using Sample Entropy

Abstract: Communication is inherent to team coordination and performance. Nonlinear time-series measures, such as Sample Entropy (SEn), provide the opportunity to examine the temporal structure of team communication. The aim for this experiment was to develop a method for applying SEn to a set of categorically coded and sequential team verbal communications recorded during a dyadic Air Battle Management (ABM) simulation. Results showed that deterministic temporal regularity was detected in team communication for three c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that adopting this approach may require either the use of speaker-only codes (i.e., codes that only represent speaker and not semantic content; cf. Strang et al, 2012;Parker et al, 2016, when exploring alternative coding systems) or the use of methods from computational linguistics that can semantically categorize single utterances in near real time (e.g., Angus et al, 2012). Alternatively, one could use more fundamental linguistic aspects such as the categorization of vocal frequency (Black et al, 2013) or speech/pause dynamics (Fusaroli & Tyl en, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that adopting this approach may require either the use of speaker-only codes (i.e., codes that only represent speaker and not semantic content; cf. Strang et al, 2012;Parker et al, 2016, when exploring alternative coding systems) or the use of methods from computational linguistics that can semantically categorize single utterances in near real time (e.g., Angus et al, 2012). Alternatively, one could use more fundamental linguistic aspects such as the categorization of vocal frequency (Black et al, 2013) or speech/pause dynamics (Fusaroli & Tyl en, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nonlinear time series analysis techniques, which can be used to characterise the degrees of temporal variation (or complexity) in complex rhythmic signals, have been successfully applied to team communications data. These approaches provide new insights into team communication dynamics while complementing information derived from other more "established" analytical approaches (Gorman, Cooke, Amazeen & Fouse, 2012;Strang, et al, 2012). In general, results from these recent studies have described findings that align with a theory of optimal complexity (Stergiou, Harbourne & Cavanaugh, 2006;Stergiou & Decker, 2011), which posits complex rhythmic systems exhibit optimal and efficient performance when they exhibit a combination of both deterministic (predictable) and stochastic (unpredictable) behaviour, i.e., systems are optimal when they exhibit simultaneous stability and flexibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…SEn parameters M and r were set at 2 and 0, respectively, for type time series following the recommendations and procedures described in Strang et al (2012) for examining nominal data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent experiment, Strang et al (2012) used Sample Entropy (SEn; Richman & Moorman, 2000) to examine temporal structure in categorically coded team communications made by teams performing a simulated air defense task. The main findings from that study were: a) confirmation that meaningful temporal structure existed in team communication (i.e., communication patterns were not random, but instead contained semideterministic temporal structure), and b) SEn values were influenced by experimental manipulationcommunication exhibited lower complexity (decreased SEn) in teams exposed to high task difficulty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%