2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Renal Impairment as a Risk Factor for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The g‐TIMI score included the four s‐TIMI variables plus two GRACE variables (SBP and eGFR). The finding that SBP and eGFR are predictors of ACS is in line with previous research on the cohort of patients presenting to ED with potential ACS. Incorporating these variables into the TIMI score slightly increased sensitivity, but reduced specificity and only enabled rule‐out for 12.0% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The g‐TIMI score included the four s‐TIMI variables plus two GRACE variables (SBP and eGFR). The finding that SBP and eGFR are predictors of ACS is in line with previous research on the cohort of patients presenting to ED with potential ACS. Incorporating these variables into the TIMI score slightly increased sensitivity, but reduced specificity and only enabled rule‐out for 12.0% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This score encompasses the measurement of hs-cTn concentration, glucose level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with eGFR also providing important prognostic information in this setting. 13 Specifically, for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), high glucose concentrations at admission to the emergency department identify patients who are more hemodynamically unstable, have a larger infarct size and have a high 30-day mortality. 14 Moreover, eGFR calculated by the CKD-EPI creatinine equation has been shown to be an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-offs used for each test were based on accepted normal levels and low-risk clinical cut points, with values of eGFR of 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or more, glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L, hs-cTnI of less than 4 ng/L and of hs-cTnT less than 8 ng/L used to identify patients at low risk (i.e., abnormal value 1 point and normal 0 points). 13,[25][26][27] For hs-cTn, 2 additional cut points were selected based on analytical variation, population and health outcome studies, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] to have a final CCS range of 0-5 points (i.e., sum of the points for the results for glucose, eGFR and hs-cTn obtained from the patient's blood work at presentation to the emergency department; Supplemental Table 1, Appendix 3, available at www.cmaj.ca/ lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.180144/-/DC1).…”
Section: Assay Methods and Clinical Chemistry Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved for all end points. Diagnosis of AMI and UAP was based on accepted international standards as described previously [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%