2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…showed that the hypothesized model of the CoI instrument was verified as an excellent fit for the data in Korean context (Yu & Richardson, 2015). It is worth noting that the reliability and validity were different between Korean and English versions of the CoI instrument.…”
Section: The Reliability and Validity Of The Coi Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…showed that the hypothesized model of the CoI instrument was verified as an excellent fit for the data in Korean context (Yu & Richardson, 2015). It is worth noting that the reliability and validity were different between Korean and English versions of the CoI instrument.…”
Section: The Reliability and Validity Of The Coi Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For example, Portuguese researchers translated and adapted the CoI instrument into Portuguese, and validated the CoI instrument in a blended learning setting (Moreira, Ferreira, & Almeida, 2013). Yu and Richardson (2015) examined the reliability and validity of a Korean version of the CoI instrument. Through reliability analysis, Cronbach's α of teaching, social, and cognitive presences were .954, .913, and .956 respectively.…”
Section: The Reliability and Validity Of The Coi Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standardized oral English exam, designed by an efl evaluation committee and applied at the same time, under same conditions in all the campuses of the university, was used to register the results of the students' first and last evaluations. The consistency of the coi questionnaire was sustained by the work of Arbaugh et al (2008) and Yu and Richardson (2015), and it has statistically demonstrated its reliability. Additionally, the interview questionnaire was revised by a tefl expert in order to validate the consistency and congruency of its Spanish translation.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…7 Nesse modelo são propostos três elementos centrais -a presença social, a presença cognitiva e a presença de ensino -que dão sustentabilidade à aprendizagem construtivista colaborativa em ambiente virtual. 8 A presença social refere-se à capacidade de os alunos se perceberem como pessoas reais, comunicando-se em ambiente virtual. As atividades de colaboração permitem aos alunos melhores oportunidades para ampliar a presença social e o sentido de comunidade online.…”
Section: Community Of Inquiry Como Modelo Teóricounclassified
“…8,12 Não foram identificados artigos com a validação transcultural do instrumento CoI no idioma português, o que demonstraria adequação das questões ao contexto em que está sendo aplicado.…”
Section: Community Of Inquiry Como Modelo Teóricounclassified