2015
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1387a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Relationships among Elementary Mathematics Teacher Efficacy and Their Students’ Mathematics Self-efficacy and Achievement

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of fifth-grade mathematics teachers' efficacy (MTE) on their students' mathematics self-efficacy (SMSE) and mathematical achievement (SMA) in classrooms. Two mathematics efficacy instruments were administered to 58 classes (i.e. 58 teachers and 1244 fifth-graders respectively) to gather data associated with SMA scores in school. Statistical analyses were applied to the obtained data. The findings revealed that MTE beliefs significantly influenced both SMSE a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
24
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined these two groups of in-service teachers after exploring the results considering different ranges of time. The number of years that made the difference was 10, as found in previous studies (e.g., Chang, 2015).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We defined these two groups of in-service teachers after exploring the results considering different ranges of time. The number of years that made the difference was 10, as found in previous studies (e.g., Chang, 2015).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…There exists a large number of research works about teacher's efficacy belief of pre-service teachers and in-service teachers (e.g., Mulholland et al, 2004;Bursal, 2010;Chang, 2015). Some of these works highlight the importance of teacher's efficacy beliefs towards mathematics to obtain positive results with their students (e.g., Sivri & Balci, 2015;García et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of pupils, authors often mention that those with a higher self-efficacy level can set higher and more challenging goals and, in addition, they often work harder to achieve them [82]. The fact that it is possible to predict pupils' specific academic achievements (especially in case of the achievements associated with solving mathematical problems) on the basis of their mathematical self-efficacy has already been described by several researchers [83]. As early as in 1983, Betz and Hackett [80] studied mathematics self-efficacy in terms of pupils' individual judgments about their capabilities to solve some specific mathematical problems and about their grade in mathematics.…”
Section: Mathematical Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach is very useful in term of the methodic teaching of a mathematics teacher the methods of organization of joint educational activity together with students. Moreover, it was noted that difficulties in studying mathematics and academic failure of students mainly depend on didactic and objective knowledge of a teacher, his professional competencies and system of pedagogical values (Chang, 2015;Tchoshanov, Lesser, & Salazar, 2008). Thus, mathematics teacher methodic training in a higher educational institution should be oriented to different directions of future professional activity, that requires the development of the multidimensional model and corresponding methods of competencies diagnostics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%