“…Theories proposing that consciously controlled recall-like retrieval processes can contribute to recognition judgments (dual-process models; e.g., Jacoby, 1991;Mandler, 1980) or theories that emphasize attributionmaking processes in recognition (e.g., Jacoby, Kelley, & Dywan, 1989;Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993;Lindsay, 2008;Whittlesea, 2002b) allow multiple potential avenues for improvement in recognition sensitivity via feedback. As Han and Dobbins (2008) noted, feedback might selectively reinforce responses that are based on the use of effective retrieval strategies or might sharpen participants' interpretations of their internal responses to test items such that they glean from these responses information that is diagnostic of oldness or newness (Dodson & Johnson, 1993;Gruppuso, Lindsay, & Kelley, 1997;Jacoby, Yonelinas, & Jennings, 1997;Jennings & Jacoby, 1993). Evidence of just such effects of feedback has been obtained in tasks manipulating participants' interpretations of cognitive fluency (Unkelbach, 2006(Unkelbach, , 2007 and on source-monitoring performance in an eyewitness suggestibility paradigm (Lane, Roussel, Villa, & Morita, 2007).…”