Examining Protein Surface Structure in Highly Conserved Sequence Variants with Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

A simple mass spectrometry based method capable of examining protein structure called SNAPP (selective noncovalent adduct protein probing) is used to evaluate the structural consequences of point mutations in naturally occurring sequence variants from different species. SNAPP monitors changes in the attachment of noncovalent adducts to proteins as a function of structural state. Mutations which lead to perturbations to the electrostatic surface structure of a protein affect noncovalent attachment and are easily observed with SNAPP. Mutations which do not alter the tertiary structure or electrostatic surface structure yield similar results by SNAPP. For example, bovine, porcine, and human insulin all have very similar backbone structures and no basic or acidic residue mutations, and the SNAPP distributions for all three proteins are very similar. In contrast, four variants of cytochrome c (cytc) have varying degrees of sequence homology, which are reflected in the observed SNAPP distributions. Bovine and pigeon cytc have several basic or acidic residue substitutions relative to horse cytc, but the SNAPP distributions for all three proteins are similar. This suggests that these mutations do not significantly influence the protein surface structure. On the other hand, yeast cytc has the least sequence homology and exhibits a unique, though related, SNAPP distribution. Even greater differences are observed for lysozyme. Hen and human lysozyme have identical tertiary structures, but significant variations in the locations of numerous basic and acidic residues. The SNAPP distributions are quite distinct for the two forms of lysozyme, suggesting significant differences in the surface structures. In summary, SNAPP experiments are relatively easy to perform, require minimal sample consumption, and provide a facile route for comparison of protein surface structure between highly homologous proteins.

Mass Shifting and Radical Delivery with Crown Ether Attachment for Separation and Analysis of Phosphatidylethanolamine Lipids

“…However, proton transfer significantly reduces the affinity of acidic groups for protonated amines (as are found in PE). However, hydrogen bond mediated noncovalent complexes between protonated primary amines and 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) are amenable to ESI-MS and have been utilized for a variety of experiments. − …”

Evaluating the Conformation and Binding Interface of Cap-Binding Proteins and Complexes via Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry

“…Several labeling-based strategies have been developed, including hydrogen–deuterium exchange (HDX), − chemical cross-linking, ,− noncovalent labeling, − and the use of chemical probes, ,,− to characterize protein structures. Chemical probe strategies, ,,− typically involve incubating a protein or protein complex with a reactive agent that covalently modifies exposed residues, thus allowing the development of a semiquantitative correlation between site-specific reactivity and solvent accessibility.…”

Protein structure evolution in liquid DESI as revealed by selective noncovalent adduct protein probing

“…SNAPP is a comparative method that utilizes non-covalent attachment of probe molecules during ESI to monitor protein structure. SNAPP has been successfully used to reveal the effects of metal ions on the structure of α-synuclein [18], to monitor structural changes induced by single amino acid mutations [19], and to distinguish small structural differences in highly homologous proteins from different species [20]. 18-Crown-6 (18C6) is typically the probe molecule used in SNAPP experiments due to its ability to non-covalently bind to the protonated side chains of lysine and arginine, or to the N-terminus.…”