2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajfs.12307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Managerial Misbehavior in Asian Banks through Loan Loss Provisions*☆

Abstract: This paper reviews the impact of corporate ownership concentration, insider ownership, and the development of regulatory and financial systems on the opportunistic behavior of managers to alter financial reporting. By using the panel data technique with a sample of banks from 25 Asian countries, the major findings indicate that ownership concentration as well as insider ownership positively impact the banks’ accrual‐based earnings management. Results also reveal that an improvement in regulatory and financial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies demonstrate that earnings management activities are negatively associated with corporate governance mechanisms (Hassan and Ahmed, 2012). Firms in Asian countries show more severe earnings management when they have poor corporate governance (Saona and Azad, 2020). An effective internal corporate governance environment restrains managerial discretion over finance choices (Zalata and Roberts, 2017).…”
Section: Empirical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies demonstrate that earnings management activities are negatively associated with corporate governance mechanisms (Hassan and Ahmed, 2012). Firms in Asian countries show more severe earnings management when they have poor corporate governance (Saona and Azad, 2020). An effective internal corporate governance environment restrains managerial discretion over finance choices (Zalata and Roberts, 2017).…”
Section: Empirical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Ben-David et al (2012) argued that, since most institutional depositors make deposits, unlike individual depositors that make deposits and receive loans, institutional depositors are relatively free to move bank deposits. In an indirect analysis of banks' dividend decisions, a study by Saona and Azad (2020) empirically analyzed the agency problem and incentive factors of bank managers in Asian countries. 3 Forti and Schiozer (2015) studied the relationship between dividends and institutional deposits ratios (CD amount held by institutional investors compared to total assets) during the financial crisis for banks in Brazil in which the deposit scale of institutional depositors exceeded one-third of current assets.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commercial bank is considered as a liaison that generates money from savers with excess supply for onward lending to investors and consumers in need [1,2]. Therefore, commercial banks bridges disproportionate information gaps amongst players in the financial market [3]. Various scholars and experts have averred that decisions on monetary policies are conveyed through various monetary policy transmission channels like lending concurrently to the economy [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introduction 11 Background To the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%