Examining longitudinal disparities in COVID-19 prevalence in the U.S.: a county level growth rate perspective

Abstract

Background: The objectives of the present study are to understand the longitudinal variability in COVID-19 reported cases at the county level and to associate the observed rates of infection with the adoption and lifting of stay-home orders. Materials and Methods: The study uses the trajectory of the pandemic in a county and controls for social and economic risk factors, physical environment, and health behaviors to elucidate the social determinants contributing to the observed rates of infection. Results and conclusion: Results indicated that counties with higher percentages of young individuals, racial and ethnic minorities and, higher population densities experienced greater difficulty suppressing transmission.Except for Education and the Gini Index, all factors were influential on the rate of COVID-19 spread before and after stay-home orders. However, after lifting the orders, six of the factors were not influential on the rate of spread; these included: African-Americans, Population Density, Single Parent Households, Average Daily PM2.5, HIV Prevalence Rate, and Home Ownership. It was concluded that different factors from the ones controlling the initial spread of COVID-19 are at play after stay-home orders are lifted. KEY MESSAGES Observed rates of COVID-19 infection at the County level in the U.S. are not directly associated with adoption and lifting of stay-home orders. Disadvantages in sociodemographic determinants negatively influence the rate of COVID-19 spread. Counties with more young individuals, racial and ethnic minorities, and higher population densities have greater difficulty suppressing transmission.

Economic resilience during COVID-19: the case of food retail businesses in Seattle, Washington

“…Third, there were limits to the frequency of observations recorded in the field for this study. More recent public health and real estate research papers are beginning to fill this gap by examining impacts over longer periods of time (Lee et al, 2021;Carozzi et al, 2022;Guo et al, 2023;Kiaghadi et al, 2022;Motoyama, 2022;Wang et al, 2022a;Wu et al, 2022;Tsou et al, 2023). Fourth, as a study of urban neighborhoods, zoned for growth, in a US city, at the center of a metropolitan area, there are limits to the generalizability of this work and its findings.…”

Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution of Public Sentiment Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Small Cities of China: A Case Study Based on Social Media Data Analysis

“…The World Health Organization [ 39 ] reported that social equity issues need to be addressed amidst COVID-19 because vulnerable groups are hit harder in terms of infection and mental health. The underdeveloped level of medicine, backward housing environment and shortage of community services in small cities are not conducive to treatment and follow-up rehabilitation for COVID-19 [ 40 ]. Therefore, it is significant and urgent to study the public emotional response to the pandemic in small cities.…”