1994
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining in infancy: Does it reflect active processing?

Abstract: Two studies explored whether sustained attention during infants' object exploration, or examining, reflects more active processing than do other components of attention. In Experiment 1, infants examined complex objects more than simple ones and novel objects more than familiar ones. In addition, 7-month-olds examined objects more than did 10-month-olds. Looking that did not involve examining did not vary systematically with either complexity or age. These findings suggest that infants' examining is related to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
101
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
101
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the infants' looking times during each block of four familiarization trials revealed a significant main effect of trial block [F(2,86) ϭ 28.01, p Ͻ .01], due to the infants' decreasing their looking during familiarization, and a main effect of age [F(1,86) ϭ 5.30, p Ͻ .05], due to 6-month-old infants looking longer overall during familiarization than did 10-month-old infants, a general trend reported in other studies (e.g., Oakes & Tellinghuisen, 1994). The infants increased their looking time to each of the tests.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The analysis of the infants' looking times during each block of four familiarization trials revealed a significant main effect of trial block [F(2,86) ϭ 28.01, p Ͻ .01], due to the infants' decreasing their looking during familiarization, and a main effect of age [F(1,86) ϭ 5.30, p Ͻ .05], due to 6-month-old infants looking longer overall during familiarization than did 10-month-old infants, a general trend reported in other studies (e.g., Oakes & Tellinghuisen, 1994). The infants increased their looking time to each of the tests.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…First, both the duration of examining and total looking will lead to the same conclusions about infants' response to novelty. Oakes et al (1991) and Oakes and Tellinghuisen (1994) found that although examining time changed with object or category familiarity, the non-examining portion of looking remained constant. Thus, the same pattern is observed whether one analyzes total looking time (examining time + non-examining time) or just examining time, and conclusions about response to novelty will be the same from analyses of each measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is strongly supported by findings with infants from 3 through 6 months tested under conditions involving dynamic and multimodal stimuli. Infants are far less distractible during periods of sustained attention in both experimental laboratory settings (Richards 1985a(Richards , 1987(Richards , 1988(Richards , 1989b(Richards , 1997bCasey & Richards 1988) as well as in more naturalistic settings during object manipulation and examination (Lansink & Richards 1997, Oakes & Tellinghuisen 1994, Tellinghuisen & Oakes 1997. Infants show improved recognition performance if either familiarization or the recognition test is conducted during sustained attention (Richards 1997a; see also Linnemayer & Porges 1986).…”
Section: Assessment Of Distraction In Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%