Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Given the increased use of technology in health care, both in extent and application, the importance of understanding the ethical implications of new health technologies increases. Profound insight into the possible ethical implications of new health technologies enhances the research and development of such technologies and the likelihood of eventual successful implementation in clinical practice. Objective This study aimed to gain an understanding of how and if researchers focused on health technologies describe the actual or possible ethical aspects of their research findings. Methods An established framework for scoping reviews was used to guide the methodology. Studies published in PubMed over the last 10 years were included if they study or refer to ethics in relation to health technology as defined by established frameworks. In total, 14,532 articles were screened, 692 were retained for full-text evaluation, and 227 were included for data extraction. Results In total, 250 (80.9%, N=309) studies were conducted in North America and Europe; literature review studies were dominant. Most studies (52.9%, 120/227) had no direct reference to any of the 4 basic ethical principles: beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. In cases where studies referenced ethical theory, consequentialism dominated. Conclusions When research about technology and ethics is published, the predominant focus is on its intent rather than its actual effect on patients. This lack of insight is problematic considering the vast advancement of technology in which ethics cannot keep up with understanding and offer insights on addressing ethical issues. This finding has implications for practice, research, and education.

An ethical code for collecting, using and transferring sensitive health data: outcomes of a modified Policy Delphi process in Singapore

“…Several studies have discussed challenges of operationalising high-level principle-based ethical codes. Examples were (i) new health technologies that emerge faster than the updating of ethical codes [ 81 ]; (ii) seen as foreign and inconsistent with cultural and societal context [ 82 ]; (iii) lack of sufficient detail (i.e. ambiguities, vagueness and contradictions) in the application to specific ethical dilemmas [ 82 ]; and (iv) lack of motivation or enforcement [ 83 ].…”

Ethics and New Health Technologies: An Innovative Descriptive Analysis of the State of the Literature

“…of importance that would merit mentioning ethics in their titles or abstracts. We contend that a major shortcoming in current research on health technologies is a lack of consideration and discussion of potential ethical dilemmas and unintended consequences arising from the implementation of health technologies (Sterling et al, 2022). This limitation can be remedied.…”

“…A comprehensive examination of health technology bodies of literature from June 9, 2020 to October 10, 2020 was conducted using PubMed (n = 180) (Sterling et al, 2022). Health technologies were identified through the Global Medical Device Nomenclature ([GMDN], 2020) and WHO (2017).…”