2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-013-9245-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Separate analyses of the research data were conducted for each year of the camps, clubs, and competitions and many of these annual results have been published elsewhere [3,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. This paper provides a synthesis of the research results, identifying data trends, and which reflect consistent and stable effects of the robotics experiences.…”
Section: Data Analysis Collection and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate analyses of the research data were conducted for each year of the camps, clubs, and competitions and many of these annual results have been published elsewhere [3,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. This paper provides a synthesis of the research results, identifying data trends, and which reflect consistent and stable effects of the robotics experiences.…”
Section: Data Analysis Collection and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing worldwide interest in developing student knowledge, skills and attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in formal and informal learning environments (National Science Board, ; National Research Council [NRC], ). The number of programs providing opportunities for student engagement in STEM education has extended to various contexts among countries during the last decade (Barker, Nugent, & Grandgenett, ). Usually, STEM activities are implemented in separate courses that have a greater emphasis on science and mathematics (Guzey, Harwell, & Moore, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short‐term STEM education programs, time can be a limiting factor for in‐depth exploration of concepts (Nugent et al, ). Another noted challenge is the lack of an encompassing evaluation and assessment framework for learning outcomes that could be useful in a wide range of out‐of‐school programs (Barker et al, ). Given the limitations of out‐of‐school programs, it is necessary to provide evidence of efficacy to decision makers, policymakers, and funding agencies about the impact of out‐of‐school education programs on student outcomes, such as knowledge, skill, and attitudes (Jensen & Sjaastad, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, robots have been used to teach STEM concepts (Altin & Pedaste, ; Barker, Nugent, & Grandgenett, ). Educational robotics (ER) differs from the other types of educational technologies as it provides a “technological fluency or literacy,” meaning to be aware of mastering knowledge and abilities (Papert, ) rather than simply “technical competence,” or specialized knowledge (Alimisis, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%