Examining Drivers of Divergence in Recorded and Perceived Human-Carnivore Conflict Hotspots by Integrating Participatory and Ecological Data

Abstract

Human-carnivore conflict is a global challenge with complex and context-specific causes and consequences. While spatial analyses can use ecological principles to predict patterns of conflict, solutions to mitigate conflict must also be locally adaptable, sustainable, and culturally-sensitive. In Nakuru County, Kenya, rapid development and land subdivision have exacerbated conflict by isolating wildlife in protected areas that are increasingly adjacent to human settlements. In an effort to understand local perspectives on carnivore conflict, and to apply this information toward locally-based conservations actions, we conducted gender-stratified interviews and participatory mapping sessions with 378 people in 16 villages near two ecologically isolated protected areas in Kenya: Lake Nakuru National Park and Soysambu Conservancy. Specifically, we developed a method for associating interview responses and demographic information with spatial participatory data to examine how local perceptions of conflict compared to spatially-explicit records of livestock depredation in the region from 2010 to 2018. We mapped kernel densities of recorded and perceived risk of human-carnivore conflict and then tested for potential social and ecological predictors of divergences found between the two datasets. Mismatched hotspots of observed and perceived risk of conflict were correlated with several ecological and socioeconomic factors. Regions with higher NDVI exhibited more perceived conflict, while the opposite held true for verified conflict. Road density was positively correlated with both types of conflict, and both types of conflict increased closer to protected areas. Livestock ownership, visitation to Lake Nakuru National Park, if the participant's child walked to school, and male gender identity were associated with more perceived conflict reports. Education level and national park visitation were associated with more positive attitudes toward carnivores. Our results show that while observed and perceived conflict may ultimately be equally important for understanding and managing human-carnivore conflict, they may be driven by markedly different social and ecological processes. We suggest that integrating the spatially explicit experiences and perspectives of local communities with more traditional ecological methods is critical to identifying lasting and socially just forms of conflict mitigation.

Coexistence across space and time: Social‐ecological patterns within a decade of human‐coyote interactions in San Francisco

“…Because interaction outcomes are moderated by human perceptions and attitudes, there can be a mismatch between perceptions of risk and the actual degree of risk in many human‐wildlife conflicts (Dickman, 2010; Wilkinson et al, 2021). Notably, in San Francisco, local hot spots and cold spots of conflict do not always map directly onto hot spots and cold spots of people's concerns about coexisting with coyotes.…”

“…Although ecological variables influence human‐wildlife interactions, the key determining factors of interaction outcomes are people, who provide the socio‐economic, political and cultural context within which conflict exists (Dickman, 2010; Peterson et al, 2010; Soulsbury & White, 2015; Wilkinson et al, 2021). These sociocultural contexts influence individual and broad‐scale actions toward wildlife, at the root of which are human perceptions of wildlife shaped by past experiences, beliefs and values that determine whether people view animals as beneficial or harmful (Dickman, 2010).…”

Review of the global research on Hyaenidae and implications for conservation and management

“…Indeed, both realized and perceived human-carnivore conflicts (Wilkinson et al 2021a) are politically rife and can have cascading effects on people (e.g. through economic losses; Yirga et al 2013) and carnivores.…”

Multidisciplinary engagement for fencing research informs efficacy and rancher-to-researcher knowledge exchange

“…Many conflict prevention strategies do not integrate agricultural expertise and impact on production systems (Miller et al, 2016), nor local relevance and technical feasibility from communities (Bijoor et al, 2021). This trend continues despite a growing awareness that creating conflict mitigation tools without multi-stakeholder input is often detrimental to the real and perceived efficacy of each tool (Redpath et al, 2013;Wilkinson et al, 2021).…”