In this study, whether item position effects lead to DIF in the condition where different test booklets are used was investigated. To do this the methods of Lord's chi-square and Raju's unsigned area with the 3PL model under with and without item purification were used. When the performance of the methods was compared, it was revealed that generally, the method of Lord's chi-square identified more items with DIF than did the method of Raju's unsigned area. The differentiation of the booklets with respect to item position resulted in a higher number of items displaying DIF with item purification conditions. Based on the findings of the present study, to avoid the occurrence of DIF due to item position effects, it is recommended to position the same items across different booklets in similar locations when forming different booklets.
Item Position EffectsThe interaction between the position of a test item in a test booklet and the performance a test taker displays on the same item is called item position effects -IP effects (Qian, 2014). Kingston and Dorans (1984) stated that, in the most classical way, IP effects may emerge in two conditions; namely, items in a measurement instrument that are positioned towards the end may be found easy by test takers owing to practice or learning effect (a positive IP effect) or they can be found difficult owing to fatigue effect (a negative IP effect). An item displaying IP effects means that the item parameters (e.g., difficulty or discrimination) can vary according to the item's position in the booklet (Weirich et al., 2017). For example, Weirich et al. ( 2017) stated that considering IP effects on item difficulty, an item administered at the end of a test often is more difficult than the same item administered at the beginning of the test (p.115). Similarly, Le (2017) concluded that items tend to be more difficult when placed towards the end of the test. The test-takers in this study may have found the items positioned towards the end difficult owing to their decrease in motivation in the exam. However, whatever the underlying reason is, conditions that occur owing to IP effects negatively impact the validity of the results. Various studies have also indicated that it is important to consider position effect to test the validity of an assessment (Hahne, 2008;Hohensinn et al., 2008;Qian, 2014). Studies in the literature investigated whether creating different test forms, arranging the location of the items in the test, and ordering the items from easy to hard or hard to easy affect the individuals' performance or item parameters. However, the results of the studies that examined this subject are not the same. While some studies have determined that the item position has a role on individuals' performance (