2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-017-9427-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining design cognition coding schemes for P-12 engineering/technology education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also studies that employ specific, or more established, coding schemes for sets of intellectual and cognitive processes. A detailed analysis of these is given Grubbs et al (2018), although the extent to which a particular process remains discrete or could form a sub-process of another remains problematic. In DeLuca's (1991) break down for example, to what extent are research and investigation part of design and does this depend on the scale at which we conceptualise different processes?…”
Section: Intellectual and Cognitive Process Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies that employ specific, or more established, coding schemes for sets of intellectual and cognitive processes. A detailed analysis of these is given Grubbs et al (2018), although the extent to which a particular process remains discrete or could form a sub-process of another remains problematic. In DeLuca's (1991) break down for example, to what extent are research and investigation part of design and does this depend on the scale at which we conceptualise different processes?…”
Section: Intellectual and Cognitive Process Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common Problem-Based-Learning (PBL) activities in STEM classrooms today reflect the cognitive thought processes of engineers and are referred to as Engineering Design Challenges (Grubbs et al, 2018;Alemdar et al, 2018). Design challenge integrated learning experiences are now the preferred method of teaching STEM as these problem-solving practices are critical features of engineering education (Bartholomew et al, 2018).…”
Section: The "E" In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, cultivating students design abilities can be highly beneficial for STEM learning concepts and develop higher order thinking. (Grubbs, Strimel, & Kim, 2018) pointed out the importance of method of teaching and scaffolding techniques by teachers by identifying student design strategies, cognitive effort and ability to apply STEM concepts to achieve meaningful learning.…”
Section: Engineering Design Learning In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%