2018
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining associations between physical activity and cardiovascular mortality using negative control outcomes

Abstract: Background The purpose of a negative control is to reproduce a condition that cannot involve the hypothesized causal mechanism, but does involve the same sources of bias and confounding that may distort the primary association of interest. Observational studies suggest physical inactivity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), although potential sources of bias, including reverse causation and residual confounding, make it difficult to infer causality. The aim was to employ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the confounding structure of the negative control and mortality. 31 Statistical analyses were performed using SAS/STAT, version 9.4, from 2018 to 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the confounding structure of the negative control and mortality. 31 Statistical analyses were performed using SAS/STAT, version 9.4, from 2018 to 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate unmeasured and residual confounding, we used a negative control outcome of accidents without a plausible mechanistic link to movement behaviours (accidents excluding falls, cycling accidents and intentional self-harm; see online supplemental table 3). 34 We also used E-values to assess the minimum strength of association that an unmeasured confounder would need with both exposure and outcome to explain away the observed association (see online supplemental methods). 35 36 Two further sensitivity analyses, addressing the treatment of zero values and comparing with a linear isotemporal substitution approach, are reported in online supplemental methods.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other cause-specific mortality included heart disease (I00–I09, I11, I13, I20–I51), Stroke (I60–I69), influenza and pneumonia (J09–J18), chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRD) (J40–J47), diabetes mellitus (E10–E14), Alzheimer’s disease (G30), kidney disease (N00–N07, N17–N19, N25–N27) and accidents (unintentional injuries) (V01–X59, Y85–Y86). Because accidents deaths have no plausible links with asthma but do have similar confounding structure to mortality, and thus accidental deaths were used as a negative control outcome 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%