2017
DOI: 10.13162/hro-ors.v5i1.2748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining a "Household" Model of Residential Long-term Care in Nova Scotia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transformations in staffing are achieved through increasing direct care (i.e. care aide) staffing ratios and incorporating additional tasks into their scope of practice, such as light housekeeping and meal preparation (Keefe et al , 2017). Architecturally, culture change manifests in neighborhood or cottage-style unit configurations, with 8-12 private resident rooms surrounding a central kitchen and living space (Rabig, 2009; Rabig et al , 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations in staffing are achieved through increasing direct care (i.e. care aide) staffing ratios and incorporating additional tasks into their scope of practice, such as light housekeeping and meal preparation (Keefe et al , 2017). Architecturally, culture change manifests in neighborhood or cottage-style unit configurations, with 8-12 private resident rooms surrounding a central kitchen and living space (Rabig, 2009; Rabig et al , 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there have been few quantitative and more rigorously controlled studies of the household model, and those that have been performed have yielded mixed evidence as to its effectiveness at improving residents’ psychosocial well-being. A relatively large, mixed methods study of HH facilities more generally versus traditional facilities found no direct effect of the care model on resident quality of life ( Keefe, 2017 ). Two smaller quantitative studies found that Green House residents reported better quality of life in several domains, and that compared to control facility residents, Green House residents’ probability of being socially engaged appeared to increase over time ( Kane, Lum, Cutler, Degenholtz, & Yu, 2007 ; Yoon, Brown, Bowers, Sharkey, & Horn, 2015 ).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial adoption, in contrast, typically includes dividing an institutional layout into “neighborhoods”—larger areas than HHs that often include 20–30 residents living in one part of the building, as well as incorporating some degree of resident choice into dining and sleeping options, consistently assigning staff to the same residents, and implementing some employee empowerment measures ( Elliot et al, 2014 ; Miller, Looze, et al, 2014 ). Facilities are facing growing pressure to adopt culture change, and increasingly, to redesign themselves as HHs (e.g., Keefe, 2017 ). Yet, there remains little evidence regarding whether any resident psychosocial benefits produced by the HH model exceed those of more typical, partial culture change adoption within a traditional environment.…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamberlain, Weeks, and Keefe (2017) note that in the Maritime provinces, new design models emerged from a culture-change movement that aimed, among other things, to install a physical design based on a resident-centered care approach. The influence of the culture-change movement can be observed in the architectural designs of neighborhood and cottage-style units with private resident rooms and central kitchens (Chamberlain, Weeks, and Keefe, 2017;Keefe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Long-term Home Care (Home For Whom?)mentioning
confidence: 99%