2020
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examinee Cohort Size and Item Analysis Guidelines for Health Professions Education Programs: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

Abstract: Purpose Using item analyses is an important quality-monitoring strategy for written exams. Authors urge caution as statistics may be unstable with small cohorts, making application of guidelines potentially detrimental. Given the small cohorts common in health professions education, this study’s aim was to determine the impact of cohort size on outcomes arising from the application of item analysis guidelines. Method The authors performed a Monte Carlo … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrimination index of a MCQ is lower in students with high scores because they choose distractors less frequently than the students with low scores [7]. This nding is also in agreement with a recent paper that shows that the reliability of easy exams is lower than the average of di cult exams reliability [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrimination index of a MCQ is lower in students with high scores because they choose distractors less frequently than the students with low scores [7]. This nding is also in agreement with a recent paper that shows that the reliability of easy exams is lower than the average of di cult exams reliability [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…According to our ndings, the lower discriminative power of MCQ exams in groups of students with high scores, could be attenuated increasing the number of case-based questions. Another potential way for correcting this low discriminative power could be to create speci c exams for each group, with different di culty levels, but it is di cult, even for large-scale professional testing organizations, to create exams at a predetermined level of di culty [17]. Furthermore, exams with different di culty levels for students in the same course may vulnerate justice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical students (n � 211) at the final week of their 5 th semester (having been taught basic pharmacology for the first time in that semester by means of lectures) were given a formative online test in February 2018 (Figure 1). e number of students fits well to recent work on size requirements in assessment studies [16]. We gave students the opportunity to get bonus points from the online test for their summative test a week later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…45 Thus, although particular characteristics, such as exam length or test-taker cohort size, may influence the evaluation of individual assessments, item difficulty and discrimination are universally accepted as quality criteria in medical literature. [46][47][48] Nevertheless, alternative approaches, such as using open-book tests for formative assessment or employing different question formats (eg, essay, openended, uncued) have been recommended for use, especially in order to test higher-level problem-solving skills and provide effective discrimination among students. 49,50 However, it is still not entirely clear that these types of questions offer a better appraisal of higher-order cognitive functioning or contribute to assessments of higher validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%