2012
DOI: 10.3791/4269-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the continuous nature of development and technical variations in marker detection, no consensus has emerged on how to define positive selection intermediates by flow cytometry 1 , 2 , 21 , 22 . To address this, we performed in silico flow cytometry on totalVI denoised surface protein expression to distinguish different pseudotime phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the continuous nature of development and technical variations in marker detection, no consensus has emerged on how to define positive selection intermediates by flow cytometry 1 , 2 , 21 , 22 . To address this, we performed in silico flow cytometry on totalVI denoised surface protein expression to distinguish different pseudotime phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next sought to use pseudotime information to clarify the intermediate stages of development in the two lineages. Thymocyte populations have been commonly defined by surface protein expression using flow cytometry, and various marker combinations and gating strategies have been employed to subset thymocyte populations based on maturity and lineage (Germain, 2002; Xiong and Bosselut, 2012; Saini et al, 2010; Hu et al, 2012). However, due to the continuous nature of developmental intermediates, as well as technical variations in marker detection, no uniform consensus has emerged on how to define positive selection intermediates by flow cytometry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%