2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.86.044907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the thermodynamical consistency of excluded-volume hadron gas models

Abstract: The new excluded volume hadron gas model by is critically discussed. We demonstrate that in this model the results obtained from relations between thermodynamical quantities disagree with the corresponding results obtained by statistical ensemble averaging. Thus, the model does not satisfy the requirements of thermodynamical consistency.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of thermodynamic consistency constraint in phenomenological excluded-volume models has recently been discussed in Ref. [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of thermodynamic consistency constraint in phenomenological excluded-volume models has recently been discussed in Ref. [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure strangeness conservation, we have imposed the condition of strangeness neutrality by considering i S i (n s i −n s i ) = 0 where S i is the strangeness of ith hadron. Recently, Gorenstein [4] has criticized our model on the basis of thermodynamical and statistical consistency and claimed that the thermodynamical average of number of baryons is not equal to its statistical average in our model. We calculate these two averages in our model and find a relationship between them as follows [5] :…”
Section: Formulation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given by Eq. (13). According to (28), the entropy per particle σ = s/n is reduced due to hardcore interaction of nucleons.…”
Section: Nucleonic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to remove this drawback were made in Refs. [7,11] (see also [12,13]). Moreover, it will be shown below that the EVM becomes inaccurate at high densities when the total volume of constituents exceeds 10-20% of the 1 Units = c = 1 are used throughout the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%