1997
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the relationship between true halo and halo error in performance ratings.

Abstract: This article is based on a master's thesis completed by Andrew L. Solomonson under the direction of Charles E. Lance. We thank Garnett Stokes and Karl Kuhnert for their comments on an earlier version of this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, information that a person is morally virtuous (e.g., honest) boosts ratings of their health and physical attractiveness (Paunonen 2006). Some halo effects may reflect accurate inferences about genuinely correlated traits (true halo), rather than perceiver bias (halo error) (Solomonson and Lance 1997;Jussim 2005). In each case, people conflate moral virtues with personality traits, mental health, intelligence, and physical attractiveness.…”
Section: Mental Health Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, information that a person is morally virtuous (e.g., honest) boosts ratings of their health and physical attractiveness (Paunonen 2006). Some halo effects may reflect accurate inferences about genuinely correlated traits (true halo), rather than perceiver bias (halo error) (Solomonson and Lance 1997;Jussim 2005). In each case, people conflate moral virtues with personality traits, mental health, intelligence, and physical attractiveness.…”
Section: Mental Health Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we did not assess participants' overall impression of the ratee and thus could not test this speculation empirically. Nonetheless, the literature describing halo in performance ratings suggests that overall evaluations can influence dimension ratings (e.g., Balzer & Sulsky, 1992;Cooper, 1981;Feldman, 1986;Murphy, Jako, & Anhalt, 1993;Nisbett & Wilson, 1977;Solomonson & Lance, 1997). Feldman made the point that if information regarding a ratee's true behavior is either not salient or absent for another reason, raters use a "default option" based on either an affective response to the ratee or an internal theory (such as a stereotype) when providing ratings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…; Murphy et al . ; Solomonson & Lance ). It is possible that carers rated service‐user participants, in this study, more negatively with regard to alexithymia because of their view of that person, in light of their challenging behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%