Examination of the Porosity in Reactive Air Brazed Joints by Ultrasonic Testing

Abstract

Reactive Air Brazing (RAB) has been developed as a method for joining ceramics and steel using CuO as a reactive agent that interacts with the surface of the ceramic, enabling a wetting by the molten filler metal. A major benefit of this method is the fact that the joining process can be carried out in an ambient atmosphere, in contrast to active brazing, which needs to be performed in a vacuum furnace. In the past, several investigations were conducted to improve the mechanical bonding. But a sealed gas tightness is also important for applications like solid oxide fuel cells. In this regard, the reduction of porosity, which is neccessary in order to achieve reproducible joints with a long lifetime, presents a challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct fundamental analyses of the reasons and mechanisms of the formation of voids in the interfacial area to guarantee a reliable joint quality.In this study, the authors used an ultrasonic testing method to evaluate the porosity in brazements produced with varying process parameters, using a light furnace. A major goal was to assess the influence of the cooling stage on the pore formation. The advantage of this non-destructive method is the possibility to scan the entire joint area using just one scan. These investigations were flanked by SEM analyses on different cross sections.

Brazing filler metals

“…Where critical (e.g. for leak tightness) void content can be assessed non-destructively by ultrasonic methods [81].…”

Influence of the Brazing Paste Composition on the Wetting Behavior of Reactive Air Brazed Metal–Ceramic Joints

“…locating porosity. [22] The third reason for the decreased mechanical properties is the oxidation of the steel and thereby the initiation of cracks on the interface between brazing filler metal and steel. [23] The thickness and the morphology of the oxide layer on steel influence the mechanical properties of the brazed ceramic-metal component dramatically.…”

A propagating mode extraction algorithm for microwave waveguide using variational mode decomposition

“…NDT&E methods are required to be low-cost, fast detection, noncontact, anti-interference, and high-accuracy. There are now many well-established NDT&E solutions such as optical method [2,3], radiography [4,5], ultrasonic [6,7], penetrant testing [8], acoustic emission [9], magnetic flux leakage [10], metal magnetic memory [11], electromagnetic method [12], and pulse eddy current and thermography-based NDT [13,14].…”