2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000095126.21206.3e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the Pathological Dissociation Taxon in Depersonalization Disorder

Abstract: In recent years, the pathologic dissociation taxon developed by Waller, Putnam, and Carlson (Psychological Methods 1:300-321, 1996) from a Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) sample has been increasingly used in studies of dissociation in general. However, the taxon's convergence with dissociative diagnoses other than DID, as well as the taxon's central premise that pathologic dissociation is a categorical rather than a dimensional construct, remain areas of exploration. This report examines the applicability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A cutoff score of 25 proved useful in identifying severe dissociative disorders (Draijer & Boon, 1993). Since its introduction, the DES has been used in hundreds of dissociation studies; a sophisticated taxonometric analysis of the DES, known as the DES‐Taxon score (Simeon et al., 2003), identified eight designated pathologic dissociation items (Waller et al., 1997). The SDQ‐20 is a self‐rating scale developed to investigate somatic component of dissociation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cutoff score of 25 proved useful in identifying severe dissociative disorders (Draijer & Boon, 1993). Since its introduction, the DES has been used in hundreds of dissociation studies; a sophisticated taxonometric analysis of the DES, known as the DES‐Taxon score (Simeon et al., 2003), identified eight designated pathologic dissociation items (Waller et al., 1997). The SDQ‐20 is a self‐rating scale developed to investigate somatic component of dissociation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include high dissociation scores on the DES, limbic system abnormalities, alterations in gray matter volume, and changes in fractional anisotropy of white matter in the corpus callosum, corona radiata, and other areas, comparable to those found in individuals with histories of childhood sexual abuse. [99,103,104] NOSOLOGY Studies of two large cohorts [46,105] have documented a consistent nosology for DPD, including age of onset, acute and remote antecedents, symptomatology, cognitive organization, course, treatment response (primarily lack of treatment response), and gender ratio. [106] Factor analysis from these studies suggest that DPD symptoms are characterized by either four or five factors: numbing, unreality of self, unreality of other, temporal disintegration, and perceptual alterations (i.e.…”
Section: Dpd and Derealizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die immer wieder berichteten Zusammenhänge zwischen (biografisch frühen) Traumatisierungen und dissoziativer Psychopathologie [28] konnten auch für das Konzept der pathologischen Dissoziation bestätigt werden: So wurde in einer nicht-klinischen Stichprobe eine Assoziation mit Kindheitstraumata, v. a. mit körperlicher Vernachlässigung und sexuellem Missbrauch, gefunden, die für normalpsychologische Dissoziation nicht bestand [29]. Auch bei delinquenten Jugendlichen sowie bei Patienten mit einer Depersonalisationsstörung wurde dieser Zusammenhang bestätigt [25,30]. Offen ist auch die Frage, wie zeitlich stabil sowohl die dimensionalen DES-Taxon Werte als auch die kategoriale Taxon-Zugehörigkeit sind [31].…”
Section: Instrumenteunclassified