2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.97.054614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the C22 radius determination with interaction cross sections

Abstract: A nuclear radius of 22 C is investigated with the total reaction cross sections at medium-to high-incident energies in order to resolve the radius puzzle in which two recent interaction cross-section measurements using 1 H and 12 C targets show the quite different radii. The cross sections of 22 C are calculated consistently for these target nuclei within a reliable microscopic framework, the Glauber theory. To describe appropriately such a reaction involving a spatially extended nucleus, the multiple scatteri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(229 reference statements)
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained radius is 2.983 fm with the real-energy discrete s-states and 3.139 fm with continuum GHF s-wave. The experimental estimated matter radius was 5.4 ± 0.9 fm in an earlier work [32] and it is 3.44±0.08 fm [35] and 3.38±0.10 fm [57] in the later works. We see that the continuum s-wave plays an important role in the calculation of the radius and the halo structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The obtained radius is 2.983 fm with the real-energy discrete s-states and 3.139 fm with continuum GHF s-wave. The experimental estimated matter radius was 5.4 ± 0.9 fm in an earlier work [32] and it is 3.44±0.08 fm [35] and 3.38±0.10 fm [57] in the later works. We see that the continuum s-wave plays an important role in the calculation of the radius and the halo structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As exemplified in Refs. [24][25][26]28,29], the OLA works well for many cases of nucleon-nucleus scattering. The multiple scattering effect would be neglected and even becomes smaller for systems involving medium to heavy nuclei as was shown in Refs.…”
Section: Elastic Scattering Differential Cross Section In the Glamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of e iχ(b) is in general difficult because it involves multiple integration [19]. Though it could be possible to perform the integration by using a Monte Carlo technique [24,25] or a factorization procedure by using a Slater determinant wave function [26][27][28][29], we, however, employ the optical-limit approximation (OLA) for the sake of simplicity. The phase-shift function of the OLA is given as the leading order of the cumulant expansion of the full phase-shift function [19,30] …”
Section: Elastic Scattering Differential Cross Section In the Glamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introducing appropriate approximations, the theory successfully reproduced the observed cross sections of the unstable nuclei and revealed the evolution of the nuclear deformation in the neutron-rich isotopes [10,11]. However, the complete and approximated Glauber amplitudes significantly deviate in case of halo nuclei where the nuclear surface is very much extended [12,13,14,15]. Since the inelastic scattering occurs mainly around the nuclear surface, the complete evaluation of the Glauber amplitude which includes all the multistep processes in the Glauber theory will be necessary for a more reliable description of the scattering processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%