2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.95.064608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the adiabatic approximation for (d,p) reactions

Abstract: Background: Deuteron-induced one-neutron transfer reactions have been used to extract single-particle properties of nuclei, and the adiabatic (AD) approximation is often used to simply treat the deuteron breakup states. Purpose: The primary goal is to examine the validity of the AD approximation for the (d, p) reaction systematically. We clarify also the role of the closed channels often ignored in the description of breakup reactions. Methods: We calculate the (d, p) cross sections with the continuum-discreti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study of (d, p) reactions, performed in the rigorous momentum-space three-body framework, indicates low sensitivity to the np potential model, and thereby a failure of the ADWA with NLOP [1]. This may appear quite unexpected, since a decent accuracy of the ADWA, 20% or better [16,17], was found when using local optical potentials. However, given that no sensitivity to the np model was observed for local optical potentials [18], much larger disagreement in the case of NLOP probably indicates the inadequacy of ADWA specifically for treating NLOP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The present study of (d, p) reactions, performed in the rigorous momentum-space three-body framework, indicates low sensitivity to the np potential model, and thereby a failure of the ADWA with NLOP [1]. This may appear quite unexpected, since a decent accuracy of the ADWA, 20% or better [16,17], was found when using local optical potentials. However, given that no sensitivity to the np model was observed for local optical potentials [18], much larger disagreement in the case of NLOP probably indicates the inadequacy of ADWA specifically for treating NLOP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In all cases, the CDCC cross sections are significantly lower than the ADWA ones. Their ratio in the maximum, shown in Table I, in most cases is higher than an average value of 1.25 reported for local optical potentials in [17]. The ratio seems to correlate with the neutron separation energy in the final state: for l = 0 transfer to the final 1/2 + state it decreases with excitation energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For 40 Ca target the effect of including the 3N force (set III) has an opposite effect to the one seen in the ADWA for both deuteron energies. For 26 Al, this force has a weaker effect on populating the 27 Al ground state than the ADWA does but it shows a slightly stronger influence for the final 27 Al state at E x = 7806 keV. In the latter case the 3N effect is still small, no more than 10% in the maximum.…”
Section: The Watanabe Model With 3n Forcementioning
confidence: 83%
“…This simple exercise demonstrates the important role of the range of the 3N interaction and shows the necessity of using a 3N force model compatible with the NN interaction model. Below, we will proceed with using The adiabatic potential U3N (R) calculated for d+ 26 Al system using hypercentral 3N potential of a fixed volume integral and several values of the hyperradius ρ0.…”
Section: Adiabatic D − a Potential With A Hypercentral 3n Interamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation