Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3488-0_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Size Effects in the Failure Prediction of Ceramic Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tensile test [30][31][32][33][34], rotating disc test [31], ring compression test [3, 32,35] and ring expansion test [36][37][38] [36]. For comparison, the dashed straight lines as seen in Figs.…”
Section: Effects Of Specimen Geometry and Stress State On Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensile test [30][31][32][33][34], rotating disc test [31], ring compression test [3, 32,35] and ring expansion test [36][37][38] [36]. For comparison, the dashed straight lines as seen in Figs.…”
Section: Effects Of Specimen Geometry and Stress State On Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous work 1 suggests that fracture mechanics procedures are not always applicable to describe fracture behaviour of porous ceramics. It is also recognised that the strength properties of ceramic components are affected by their geometric sizes and shapes associated with the loading mode 2–14 . A new approach for porous ceramics is required in the evaluation of the size effect on strength as well as statistical strength properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the shape and/or size of specimen and the loading mode affect strength characteristics in ceramic materials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For successful applications of ceramics to engineering components, strength characteristics of notched components with an appropriate procedure to estimate them should be also investigated in the relation to the well-known size effect [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%