2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of sensory product characterization bias when check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions are used concurrently with hedonic assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that previous research (Ares & Jaeger, 2015) has shown that hedonic questions do not bias responses to CATA questions, the similarity between sensory spaces obtained using CATA questions and descriptive analysis is not expected to be influenced by concurrent elicitation of sensory and hedonic data.…”
Section: How Similar Are the Elicited Sample Configurations And Produmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that previous research (Ares & Jaeger, 2015) has shown that hedonic questions do not bias responses to CATA questions, the similarity between sensory spaces obtained using CATA questions and descriptive analysis is not expected to be influenced by concurrent elicitation of sensory and hedonic data.…”
Section: How Similar Are the Elicited Sample Configurations And Produmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It also fails to acknowledge that sensory characterisation with consumers can address individual differences in perception and contribute to a better understanding of hedonic segmentation (Hayes, 2015;Moskowitz & Bernstein, 2000). In this sense, previous research has highlighted that consumers with different preference patterns describe samples differently using CATA questions, particularly for terms related to complex sensory characteristics or attribute intensity (Ares & Jaeger, 2015).…”
Section: How Similar Are the Elicited Sample Configurations And Produmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, hedonic liking was assessed concurrently with the CATA scores. Although research with adults showed that hedonic or sensory profiling bias is unlikely to occur when both methods are concurrently assessed (Ares & Jaeger, ; Jaeger & Ares, ; Jaeger et al, ; Schouteten, Gellynck, et al, ), it is unclear whether that is also the case when working with children. Finally, the terms were listed alphabetically and were not randomized between the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is unclear if combining both question types could have influenced the results, several studies with adults suggest that sensory characterizations using the CATA approach is not likely to influence the hedonic assessment of food products (Jaeger & Ares, ; Jaeger et al, ). Further, Ares and Jaeger () concluded that there is little effect of asking the hedonic liking on the sensory product characterization of foods. It has been recommended to include hedonic measurements before asking emotional profiling in order to reduce potential bias (King et al, ) which has been taken into account in the design of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory terms were selected based upon pilot work, using the same procedure as for the emotional term selection described above, and previous research (Ares & Jaeger, ; Ares & Jaeger, ; Ares, Varela, Rado, & Giménez, ; Jaeger et al, ; Jaeger et al, ; Vidal et al, ). The sensory terms covered all sensory modalities, among which appearance, aroma, flavor, and texture (Ares & Jaeger, ; Ares et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%