2000
DOI: 10.1086/308249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Scaling Relationships Involving Penetration Distance at the Bottom of a Stellar Convective Envelope

Abstract: A number of studies in the recent past have proposed a variety of scaling relationships among the penetration depth at the bottom of a convective region, the vertical velocity of the Ñuid and theWhile a relationship of the form has been proposed by Schmitt and coworkers (F b ). * d P V z 3@2 on the basis of the equations of motion for buoyant plumes, Zahn proposed a similar relationship based on scaling arguments. The relationships involving and the input Ñux are based on recent two-* d , V z , dimensional num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of the extent of the penetration into the upper stable layer has been based on time-and horizontally averaged kinetic flux (F k ). Such a choice is obvious as the kinetic flux is directly related with the motions and the profile is also convenient for estimation of the extent of penetration (Hurlburt et al 1986, Hurlburt et al 1994, Singh et al 1994, Saikia et al 2000, Pal et al 2007). We illustrate this point by plotting the distribution of kinetic energy flux for several sets of models in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation of the extent of the penetration into the upper stable layer has been based on time-and horizontally averaged kinetic flux (F k ). Such a choice is obvious as the kinetic flux is directly related with the motions and the profile is also convenient for estimation of the extent of penetration (Hurlburt et al 1986, Hurlburt et al 1994, Singh et al 1994, Saikia et al 2000, Pal et al 2007). We illustrate this point by plotting the distribution of kinetic energy flux for several sets of models in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general behaviour of convective transport in a stellar-type setting has been studied using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach by several groups (Chan & Sofia 1986, Hossain & Mullan 1991, Muthsam et al 1995, Singh & Chan 1993, Singh et al 1994, 1996, 1998a,b, 2001Saikia et al 2000, Chan 2001, Pal et al 2007). LES, being less demanding on speed and memory as it can have a coarser grid, allows large scale flows to be modeled explicitly while the smaller scales are modeled by some sort of sub-grid scale formulation (Smagorinsky 1963).…”
Section: Parameters Of Computed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct numerical simulations using the anelastic approximation rather than compressible convection have also been performed in a twodimensional cylindrical geometry (Rogers & Glatzmaier 2005;Rogers et al 2006); these works used a realistic stellar stratification rather than a polytropic stratification, but the thermal diffusivity was artificially increased. Several other early studies have produced large eddy simulations, typically using a standard Smagorinsky subgrid scale model, in a local domain with Cartesian geometry (Xie & Toomre 1993;Singh et al 1995Singh et al , 1998Saikia et al 2000;Pal et al 2007). Direct numerical simulation is a sensible choice when the focus is dynamo action, because when a magnetic field is present, small-scale motions feed back on large scale motions in ways that are not completely understood (Miesch et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct numerical simulations of convective penetration then is the only alternative to estimate penetration depths. Such calculations have been performed in the past by several authors in two space dimensions (Cattaneo et al 1990;Xie & Toomre 1993;Hurlburt et al 1994) and, more recently, in three space dimensions (Singh et al 1996;Nordlund & Stein 1996;Singh et al 1998a,b;Saikia et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%