2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Project Duration, Project Intensity, and Timing of Cost Certainty in Highway Project Delivery Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is characterized by the same organization chart of the DBB method in that the owner signs separate contracts with the A/E and the GC who is otherwise referred to as a construction manager at risk (CMR) under this method. Unlike DBB, where construction starts after the full completion of design documents, the design in CMAR is released progressively (Antoine et al , 2019). The owner contracts with the CM for pre-construction services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is characterized by the same organization chart of the DBB method in that the owner signs separate contracts with the A/E and the GC who is otherwise referred to as a construction manager at risk (CMR) under this method. Unlike DBB, where construction starts after the full completion of design documents, the design in CMAR is released progressively (Antoine et al , 2019). The owner contracts with the CM for pre-construction services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owners opt for alternative project delivery methods (APDMs) for the main reason of compressing the project schedule, i.e. reducing the overall project delivery time, (Lopez Del Puerto et al , 2008, Culp, 2011; Touran et al , 2011; Sullivan et al , 2017; Antoine et al , 2019) or delivering projects at a more intense pace (Antoine et al , 2019). A plethora of scholars studied the comparison of APDMs performance in respect of the project cost, time and quality achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested essential strategies to enhance on-time project delivery including introducing mandatory buildability and constructability framework, promoting collaborative procurement, and regulating the demand and supply of foreign labor. Antoine et al (2019) compared the project delivery methods of US highway projects and found that procurement, studies required by the National Environmental Policy Act, and right-of-way requirements are the key contributors to project delay. Budayan (2019) studied how consultants and the public and private sectors perceived delay causes in building-operate-transfer projects in Turkey and found that the most important delay causes are related to uncertainties and changes.…”
Section: Construction Task Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the paper highlighted that higher levels of planned cost translated non-linearly into greater project duration. Antoine et al (2018) focused on investigating the relation among project duration, project intensity and timing of cost certainty in highway project delivery methods. They concluded that alternative contracting methods are viable options for shortening project durations, establishing early cost certainty during project delivery and delivering projects at a more intense pace.…”
Section: Project Duration Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%