2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-015-9703-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Lower Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Its Connection to Students’ Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In-service teachers training programs have broadly achieved the general agreement of technologies that deliver a huge impact on instruction (Dalal et al, 2017). It has been recommended that ICT for instructional strategies to improve for example science learning; provoking cognitive factors (Tchoshanov, Cruz, Huereca, Shakirova, Shakirova & Ibragimova, 2017) and providing adaptation in learning with scaffolding (Niess, 2018). In more general terms, technologies have been continuously informed and discussed for its contribution to learning strategies namely, cooperative learning, problem-based learning, contextual learning, and situated learning as well as collaborative learning (Ifinedo, Kankaanranta, Neittaanmäki & Hämäläinen, 2017).…”
Section: Science Teachers' Tpackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-service teachers training programs have broadly achieved the general agreement of technologies that deliver a huge impact on instruction (Dalal et al, 2017). It has been recommended that ICT for instructional strategies to improve for example science learning; provoking cognitive factors (Tchoshanov, Cruz, Huereca, Shakirova, Shakirova & Ibragimova, 2017) and providing adaptation in learning with scaffolding (Niess, 2018). In more general terms, technologies have been continuously informed and discussed for its contribution to learning strategies namely, cooperative learning, problem-based learning, contextual learning, and situated learning as well as collaborative learning (Ifinedo, Kankaanranta, Neittaanmäki & Hämäläinen, 2017).…”
Section: Science Teachers' Tpackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed study consisted of two stages: 1) quantitative stage was used for the purpose of selection of teacher sample; 2) qualitative stage was applied to analyze teacher responses on a set of open-ended questions on the division of fractions. For the first stage, quantitative data from previous studies (Tchoshanov, 2011(Tchoshanov, , 2017a(Tchoshanov, , 2017b(Tchoshanov, , 2017c) was used to further zoom into qualitative analysis of unpacking shared approaches as well as to address contested areas in teachers' topic-specific content knowledge in the U.S. and Russia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that teachers' CK is a prerequisite for PCK (Ball et al, ; Baumert et al, ; Friedrichsen et al, ) and may moderate the development of PCK (Kleickmann et al, ). Others have claimed that teacher CK is important in maintaining high cognitive demand in the classroom (Henningsen and Stein, ; Tchoshanov et al, ), and that the level of cognitive demand in the mathematics classroom correlates to student learning (Stein et al, ). Tchoshanov et al () found that math teacher's CK (defined here as knowledge of facts, procedures, concepts and connections) was correlated with student performance.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have claimed that teacher CK is important in maintaining high cognitive demand in the classroom (Henningsen and Stein, ; Tchoshanov et al, ), and that the level of cognitive demand in the mathematics classroom correlates to student learning (Stein et al, ). Tchoshanov et al () found that math teacher's CK (defined here as knowledge of facts, procedures, concepts and connections) was correlated with student performance. Similarly, Khourey‐Bowers and Fenk () stated that science teachers with deeper subject specific knowledge can provide richer learning environments for their students.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%