1974
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(74)85032-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of intramolecular potential surfaces of flexible conjugated molecules by calculation of crystal structures. equilibrium geometries of chalc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most stable conformation for retinoids is all-trans . 174 , 175 Alternative geometrical isomers introduce some steric hindrance that increases the conformational energy compared to the all-trans isomer. 176 Although some retinal isomers introduce only mild steric clashes, e.g.…”
Section: Isomerization Of Retinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most stable conformation for retinoids is all-trans . 174 , 175 Alternative geometrical isomers introduce some steric hindrance that increases the conformational energy compared to the all-trans isomer. 176 Although some retinal isomers introduce only mild steric clashes, e.g.…”
Section: Isomerization Of Retinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, polyene single bonds display some double-bond characteristics contributing to their preferred planar conformation. The most stable conformation for retinoids is all-trans . , Alternative geometrical isomers introduce some steric hindrance that increases the conformational energy compared to the all-trans isomer . Although some retinal isomers introduce only mild steric clashes, e.g.…”
Section: Isomerization Of Retinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two benzene rings are not coplanar with the enone sytem; there is a 11.0 (4) angle between the C4-benzene ring and the enone system (C2-C3-C4-C5) and a 25.4 (3) angle between the 1-benzene ring and the enone system (C2-C1-C10-C15). This non-linearity is commonly observed in other p 0 -substituted chalcones (Rabinovich & Schmidt, 1970;Rabinovich et al, 1973;Warshel et al, 1974;Toda et al, 1998;Li et al, 1992), and is likely due to the accommodation of the bulky 4substituent within the crystal structure.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Bond C(3)--C(4) 1-420 1.419 1.397 C(4)--C (5) 1.418 1.417 1.398 C(4)--C (7) 1-480 1-478 1.470 C (7) (7) 118.5 118-5 118.1 C(5)--C(4)--C (7) 122.9 122.8 124.0 C(4)--C(7)--C (8) 125.3 125.2 126-9 C(7)--C(8)--C (9) 120.7 120.6 121.2 C(8)--C(9)--C (10) 122-3 122.3 123.9 C(9)--C(10)-C (11) 123-5 123.7 125.9 C(10)-C(I 1)-C (12) 122.2 122.6 124-8 C (10) sistent Force-Field to n electron system (Warshel & Karplus, 1972). The energy parameters used, involving C and H atoms were those of set A given by Warshel, Huller, Rabinovich & Shakked (1974)and the nonbonded potential parameters of CI... CI, CI... C and CI...H were the refined values of set B given by Bonadeo & D'Alessio (1973). Some of the calculated results are given in Table 6 together with the corresponding experimental values corrected for libration motion.…”
Section: Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%