1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(96)00131-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of four methods for measuring soil respiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We recalculated the mean Rs flux and its CV in each biome and found that the global mean (site-based) Rs flux increased slightly from 0.817 kgC/m 2 /yr to 0.845 kgC/m 2 /yr, suggesting that the impact of the chemical absorption (CA) method on estimating global mean Rs is minor. Previous studies showed that the CA method generally underestimates the Rs under high respiration rates and overestimates Rs under low respiration rates (Ewel et al, 1987;Rochette et al, 1992;Nay et al, 1994;Bekku et al, 1997;Norman et al, 1997;Knoepp and Vose, 2002). Our results suggest that the errors of the CA method might cancel out in estimating global mean Rs flux.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Distribution Of Rs Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We recalculated the mean Rs flux and its CV in each biome and found that the global mean (site-based) Rs flux increased slightly from 0.817 kgC/m 2 /yr to 0.845 kgC/m 2 /yr, suggesting that the impact of the chemical absorption (CA) method on estimating global mean Rs is minor. Previous studies showed that the CA method generally underestimates the Rs under high respiration rates and overestimates Rs under low respiration rates (Ewel et al, 1987;Rochette et al, 1992;Nay et al, 1994;Bekku et al, 1997;Norman et al, 1997;Knoepp and Vose, 2002). Our results suggest that the errors of the CA method might cancel out in estimating global mean Rs flux.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Distribution Of Rs Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…19, Aug. 09 and Aug. 22, 2005. Numerous studies have concluded that the static gas chamber method is sensitive to accumulation of CO 2 in the chamber, which may negatively suppress further efflux from the soil surface (Nakayama 1990;Bekku et al 1997;Welles et al 2001). Samples were collected at times 0, 5, 10 and 20 min; however, the CO 2 concentrations at times 0 and 5 were used for calculation of soil CO 2 efflux to avoid underestimation of the rate of efflux caused by the suppressive effect of accumulated CO 2 in the chamber on further efflux from the soil during longer sampling intervals.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…type of soil, humus-layer quality and moisture content (MerilaÈ and Ohtonen, 1997), temperature (Wildung et al, 1975), irradiation (Wen et al, 1997), tillage and soil texture (Franzluebbers and Arshad, 1997) and pro®le depth (Rovira and Vallejo, 1997). Due to its importance and complexity it is a widely studied process (Bekku et al, 1996;Pomazkina et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%