2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(00)00387-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of codeposited a-C:D-layers in oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the technique has serious drawbacks, such as the required wall temperatures difficult to achieve in ITER, which should be above 550 K, the interaction with other non-carbon invessel components (such as Be), the recovery time for normal plasma operation and the processing of the resulting tritiated water. Recently, ozone has been shown to oxidise carbon layers at significantly lower temperature compared with molecular oxygen [458], but this method has not been yet demonstrated in the tokamak. More experiments are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques, the recovery of released tritium, the interaction with the non-carbon ITER wall materials, the handling of the debris that is potentially produced by ablative methods and the recovery of plasma operation, before a credible tritium clean up schedule and their consequences for ITER operation can be evaluated in a quantitative way.…”
Section: Tritium Removal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the technique has serious drawbacks, such as the required wall temperatures difficult to achieve in ITER, which should be above 550 K, the interaction with other non-carbon invessel components (such as Be), the recovery time for normal plasma operation and the processing of the resulting tritiated water. Recently, ozone has been shown to oxidise carbon layers at significantly lower temperature compared with molecular oxygen [458], but this method has not been yet demonstrated in the tokamak. More experiments are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques, the recovery of released tritium, the interaction with the non-carbon ITER wall materials, the handling of the debris that is potentially produced by ablative methods and the recovery of plasma operation, before a credible tritium clean up schedule and their consequences for ITER operation can be evaluated in a quantitative way.…”
Section: Tritium Removal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On those areas, external heating by lamps or lasers might also be possible. These techniques cannot be used on remote areas for which no clear scenario presently exists except mechanical tools or the use of gaseous, chemical treatments by active oxygen or ozone [48,49]. These techniques must be compatible with plasma operation and need research in present tokamaks.…”
Section: Other Key Pwi Questions For Itermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For amorphous hydrocarbon films (a-C:H), combustion starts above 500-600 K [14,15]. The thermal oxygen radicals, atomic oxygen [16] and ozone [17], exhibit much higher reactivity at moderate temperatures, and there is indication that their reactivity toward a-C:H is still significant at room temperature. Bombardment of carbon with an oxygen ion beam leads to what is known as chemical sputtering or reactive ion etching [18][19][20]; in addition to physical sputtering the ions react chemically at the end of their range and form CO, CO 2 , and H 2 O, leading to highly enhanced sputtering yields and significantly lower threshold energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%