2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exaggerated responses to stress in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse: An unusual behavioral phenotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we found more pronounced duration of USV calls in BTBR than C57BL animals in response to the foot-shock in spite of their low expression of behavioral freezing, pointing out that USVs are different from this behavioral parameter of fear response, supporting previous report on CaMKIV À/À mice (Ko et al, 2005). Moreover, in response to the fearful context, individually-trained BTBR mice gave USV calls of longer duration than the C57BL group, supporting their high stress responsiveness (Benno et al, 2009). Co-training of mice of both inbred strains with a BTBR partner as a "fear facilitator" that emitted more USVs during the training session significantly facilitated contextual fear memory that corresponds to behavioral freezing.…”
Section: Fear Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we found more pronounced duration of USV calls in BTBR than C57BL animals in response to the foot-shock in spite of their low expression of behavioral freezing, pointing out that USVs are different from this behavioral parameter of fear response, supporting previous report on CaMKIV À/À mice (Ko et al, 2005). Moreover, in response to the fearful context, individually-trained BTBR mice gave USV calls of longer duration than the C57BL group, supporting their high stress responsiveness (Benno et al, 2009). Co-training of mice of both inbred strains with a BTBR partner as a "fear facilitator" that emitted more USVs during the training session significantly facilitated contextual fear memory that corresponds to behavioral freezing.…”
Section: Fear Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed, a recent study found that diazepam, an anxiolytic compound, was able to normalize the social preference in BTBR mice . The exaggerated response to stress in BTBR mice was previously shown through increased levels of corticosterone in the blood compared to C57BL strain (Benno et al, 2009), so perhaps social learning might reduce the increased level of corticosterone and improve episodic memory, suggesting neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying the effects of social learning on emotional-cognitive processes.…”
Section: Spatial Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One potential confound to consider is the role anxiety may contribute to the social behavior deficits and perseverative behaviors in the BTBR mouse. To date, there are numerous conflicting reports using a range of behavioral assays stating both elevated anxiety-like responses (Benno et al, 2009; Pobbe et al, 2011) and low stress responses (Silverman et al, 2010) as well as no observable difference in anxiety-like behaviors compared to the C57BL/6J mouse (Karvat and Kimchi, 2012; McFarlane et al, 2008; Moy et al, 2007). …”
Section: Behavioral Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of amygdala dysfunction in individuals with ASD (Baron-Cohen et al, 2000; Sweeten, Posey, Shekhar, & McDougle, 2002) has been suggested as a link to the high rates of anxiety in this population (Amaral, Bauman, & Schumann, 2003). Studies encompassing a variety of foci for knock-out mouse models of autism (including genes involved in serotonin, immunoglobulin, and corticosterone production) have reported both impaired social behavior and increased anxiety-related behavior in affected mice (Takayanagi et al, 2010; Balemans et al, 2010; Benno, Smirnova, Vera, Liggett, & Schanz, 2009; Lesch & Mossner, 1998). Additionally, the elevated rates of anxiety disorders in relatives of individuals with ASD suggest a common genetic link between the two symptom spectra (Piven & Palmer, 1999; Gadow, DeVincent, & Scheider, 2008; Bolton, Pickles, Murphy, & Rutter, 1998; Smalley, McCracken, & Tanguay, 1995; Delong & Dwyer, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%