The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact variance component tests for longitudinal microbiome studies

Abstract: In metagenomic studies, testing the association between microbiome composition and clinical outcomes translates to testing the nullity of variance components. Motivated by a lung human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) microbiome project, we study longitudinal microbiome data by using variance component models with more than two variance components. Current testing strategies only apply to models with exactly two variance components and when sample sizes are large. Therefore, they are not applicable to longitudinal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although under regularity conditions, and are consistent estimators for variance component parameters and under the null hypothesis , the classical score-type variance component test above treats them as fixed numbers and ignores the variability in their estimation, which could result in not well-calibrated p values in finite samples. This is a known issue for score-type variance component tests in microbiome association studies with small sample sizes [ 48 50 ]. Despite large sample sizes in biobank-scale cohorts, the local IBD matrix Ψ l for genetic locus l is often sparse, which could invalidate asymptotic inference on the quadratic form .…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although under regularity conditions, and are consistent estimators for variance component parameters and under the null hypothesis , the classical score-type variance component test above treats them as fixed numbers and ignores the variability in their estimation, which could result in not well-calibrated p values in finite samples. This is a known issue for score-type variance component tests in microbiome association studies with small sample sizes [ 48 50 ]. Despite large sample sizes in biobank-scale cohorts, the local IBD matrix Ψ l for genetic locus l is often sparse, which could invalidate asymptotic inference on the quadratic form .…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a known issue for scoretype variance component tests in microbiome association studies with small sample sizes. [43][44][45] Despite large sample sizes in biobank-scale cohorts, the local IBD matrix 𝛹 𝑙 for genetic locus 𝑙 is often sparse, which could invalidate asymptotic inference on the quadratic form 𝑄 𝑙 =…”
Section: Variance Component Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inference on Statistica Sinica: Newly accepted Paper (accepted author-version subject to English editing) the variance components is less studied and often requires strong distributional assumptions on the random effects and the error terms. When the underlying distributions are assumed to be multivariate normal, classical inference methods, such as the likelihood ratio test, the restricted likelihood ratio test, and the score test (Self and Liang, 1987;Zhang and Lin, 2003;Koh et al, 2019;Zhai et al, 2019), can be applied. However, these parametric methods are often restrictive and not robust if the model assumptions are violated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear structure holds when each components of D(θ * ) is a linear function of θ * (Lin, 1997). This encompasses both nested, crossed and clustered designs (Michalski and Zmyślony, 1996;Zhai et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2019;Li et al, 2021). See Section 5.1 for a specific example of such a random-effect model for modeling the family data that includes additive genetic effect, common environment and unique subject-specific We first introduce some notation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%