2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3159445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact two-component Hamiltonians revisited

Abstract: Two routes for deriving the exact two-component Hamiltonians are compared. In the first case, as already known, we start directly from the matrix representation of the Dirac operator in a restricted kinetically balanced basis and make a single block diagonalization. In the second case, not considered before, we start instead from the Foldy–Wouthuysen operator and make proper use of resolutions of the identity. The expressions are surprisingly different. It turns out that a mistake was made in the former formul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
278
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
278
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(14). Much activity has been directed in recent years at the development of practical and efficient methods to construct a fully decoupled 2c one-electron Hamiltonian from matrix representations of the 4c Hamiltonian, [73][74][75][76][77] allowing for a full elimination of the lower components with explicit construction of a matrix representation of U. Information regarding the development of these methods, now collectively termed X2C ("eXact 2-Component"), and details about the construction of such operators, can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Relativistic Quantum Chemistry Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14). Much activity has been directed in recent years at the development of practical and efficient methods to construct a fully decoupled 2c one-electron Hamiltonian from matrix representations of the 4c Hamiltonian, [73][74][75][76][77] allowing for a full elimination of the lower components with explicit construction of a matrix representation of U. Information regarding the development of these methods, now collectively termed X2C ("eXact 2-Component"), and details about the construction of such operators, can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Relativistic Quantum Chemistry Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their implementation, the basis functions are first converted into an orthonormalized set and every matrix is then evaluated within the orthonormalized set, while the implementation in the BDF program uses the matrices expressed in unnormalized basis functions. Dyall's renormalization matrix turned out to be problematic [73] and a new implementation in the BDF program fixed this problem using a new renormalization matrix, which made the BDF implementation equivalent to the IOTC method of the DIRAC program. Finally, Liu and co-workers found the name XQR to be not suitable to describe this approach.…”
Section: One-step Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later it was generalized to the so-called exact twocomponent (X2C) method by several groups. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Since the DKH method also employs matrix techniques to evaluate the Douglas-Kroll transformation, it is also able to exactly decouple the four-component Hamiltonian matrix. This has been shown within the arbitrary-order approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%