1993
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/26/7/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact solution of a 1D asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation

Abstract: Several recent works have shown that the onedimensional fully asymmetric exclusion model, which describes a ystem of panicles hopping in a preferred direction with hard core interactions, can be solved exactb in the case of open boundaries. Here we present a new approach based on representing the weights of each mnfiguration in the steady state as a product of noncommuting matrices. Wth this approach the whole solution of the problem is reduced to finding two matrices and two vectors which satisQ ve'y simple a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

51
2,100
3
14

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,217 publications
(2,168 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
51
2,100
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean-field approach predicts phase transitions in the steady state as parameters controlling the rate of insertion and extraction of particles at the boundaries are varied [31]. The existence of these phase transitions is confirmed through an exact solution of the ASEP [29][30][31], achieved using a powerful matrix product approach [32,34] which has subsequently been used to solve many generalisations of the ASEP. The details of the matrix product method are not necessary for the following-suffice to say that one ends up calculating a normalisation proportional to (23) through a product of matrices, often of infinite dimension.…”
Section: Iv1 Driven Diffusive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean-field approach predicts phase transitions in the steady state as parameters controlling the rate of insertion and extraction of particles at the boundaries are varied [31]. The existence of these phase transitions is confirmed through an exact solution of the ASEP [29][30][31], achieved using a powerful matrix product approach [32,34] which has subsequently been used to solve many generalisations of the ASEP. The details of the matrix product method are not necessary for the following-suffice to say that one ends up calculating a normalisation proportional to (23) through a product of matrices, often of infinite dimension.…”
Section: Iv1 Driven Diffusive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction of such companion operatorsX α is a sufficient task to prove (1.1) as is well known. See for example [4]. In our setting of the n-TAZRP, the X α andX α are linear operators on the space of "internal degrees of freedom" F ⊗n(n−1)/2 as depicted in the corner transfer matrix type diagram (2.7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle is randomly chosen at a time step, and moves toward smaller coordinate values from (x ′ , y ′ ) to (x, y), where x < x ′ and y < y ′ , until reaching the boundary at x = 1 or y = 1. We emphasize that this type of CA with splitting differs from the asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) [26] and the contact (or voter) model [25], since there are no spatial exclusions and no interaction between any particles. This representation of random walks with splitting is inspirational for deriving a combinatorial analytic form of the distribution of areas.…”
Section: Combinatorial Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%