2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2019.8849311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Recovery for a Family of Community-Detection Generative Models

Abstract: Generative models for networks with communities have been studied extensively for being a fertile ground to establish information-theoretic and computational thresholds. In this paper we propose a new toy model for planted generative models called planted Random Energy Model (REM), inspired by Derrida's REM. For this model we provide the asymptotic behaviour of the probability of error for the maximum likelihood estimator and hence the exact recovery threshold. As an application, we further consider the 2 non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge the approach is novel for hypergraph models. There have also been some works taking some more conventional approaches, for example, information-theoretic bounds in densest subhypergraphs [Buhmann et al] and hypergraph SBMs [Corinzia et al, 2019], as well as detection (i.e., determining whether there exists certain planted structures) in hypergraph SBMs [Angelini et al, 2015] and hypergraph planted cliques [Zhang and Xia, 2018]. These could be a direction in our future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge the approach is novel for hypergraph models. There have also been some works taking some more conventional approaches, for example, information-theoretic bounds in densest subhypergraphs [Buhmann et al] and hypergraph SBMs [Corinzia et al, 2019], as well as detection (i.e., determining whether there exists certain planted structures) in hypergraph SBMs [Angelini et al, 2015] and hypergraph planted cliques [Zhang and Xia, 2018]. These could be a direction in our future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• FEMNIST (image) [8]: It includes images of handwritten characters with 62 labels and is divided into 3,400 sub-datasets by writers. FEMNIST Writer [7], [9], [12], [13], [25], [28], [31], [32], [37], [38] Random [28] Class [32] Shakespeare Role [27], [37], [39], [38], [32], [13] Office-Home Domain [49] Sent140 User [12], [32] Vehicle Sensors Network Sensor [31], [48], [13] Human Activity Recognition Smartphone [48], [13] GLEAM Smart glass [48] FLICKR-AES Worker [4] MNIST Random [45], [39], [15], [5], [13] Class [46], [24], [50], [39], [9] , [7], [15], [32], [19], [34] Dirichlet dist.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few other works studied how the same AoN phenomenon extends to other estimators. Examples include [17], [18], where non-matching upper and lower bounds are provided for the transition of the vectorial-MLE in the sparse planted hypergraph problem (equivalent to sparse tensor-PCA up to a reparameterization of the dimensionality of the problem), and [19] where the AoN is proved in the sparse linear regression model for the vectorial-MLE estimator.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 13 (equivalent to Theorem 1 in [17]). For the model defined in Equation (1), the MLE estimator reads:…”
Section: Appendix C Useful Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%