1989
DOI: 10.1002/oca.4660100207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact penalty function approach to constrained optimal control problems

Abstract: Given the well known concept that optimal control problems may be solved either by the maximum principle or by the dynamic programming technique which employs many numerical algorithms, this paper attempts to show that the exact penalty function method may be used to transform a constrained optimal control problem into an unconstrained optimal control problem. Under certain conditions the constrained optimal control problem is shown to be equivalent to an unconstrained optimal control problem, which can be eas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 4 implies that if w J* we can solve the constrained optimal control problem (1) (4) by solving one single unconstrained problem (5). In general, it is difficult to know the exact value of J.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 4 implies that if w J* we can solve the constrained optimal control problem (1) (4) by solving one single unconstrained problem (5). In general, it is difficult to know the exact value of J.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be shown how a sequence {w of real numbers can be generated automatically by the non-parameter penalty function method. For each w', solve (5) to get a sequence {u(t)} of unconstrained solutions which converges to a solution to the original constrained optimal control problem (1) (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, one can suppose that the integrand is only locally Lipschitz continuous in x and u, and impose the same growth conditions on the Clarke subdifferential (or some other suitable subdifferential), as we did on the derivatives of this functions. Also, it seems worthwhile to analyze connections between necessary/sufficient optimality conditions and the local exactness of penalty functions (cf, the papers of Xing et al, 35,36 and sections 4.6.2 and 4.7.2 in Reference 22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, Fletcher 7 introduced the exact penalty function method to find the solution of the continuously differentiable constrained optimization problem. However, many results have been established on exact penalty function method for differentiable and nondifferentiable optimization problems (see, for example, 1,8,9,13,20 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%