1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.478738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact method for the simulation of Coulombic systems by spherically truncated, pairwise r−1 summation

Abstract: Based on a recent result showing that the net Coulomb potential in condensed ionic systems is rather short ranged, an exact and physically transparent method permitting the evaluation of the Coulomb potential by direct summation over the r−1 Coulomb pair potential is presented. The key observation is that the problems encountered in determining the Coulomb energy by pairwise, spherically truncated r−1 summation are a direct consequence of the fact that the system summed over is practically never neutral. A sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
873
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 848 publications
(885 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
873
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…40 However, for surface-dominated nanomaterials such as NWs in the present work, the periodicity assumption is clearly violated, and therefore it is crucial to employ a truncation-based summation method. In this work, we have utilized the truncation-based summation approach initially proposed by Wolf et al in 1999 41 and further developed by Fennell and Gezelter in 2006. 42 A key development in the work by Fennell and Gezelter 42 was to ensure that the electrostatic force and potential are consistent with each other, while remaining continuous at the interatomic cut-off distance.…”
Section: Structure and Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 However, for surface-dominated nanomaterials such as NWs in the present work, the periodicity assumption is clearly violated, and therefore it is crucial to employ a truncation-based summation method. In this work, we have utilized the truncation-based summation approach initially proposed by Wolf et al in 1999 41 and further developed by Fennell and Gezelter in 2006. 42 A key development in the work by Fennell and Gezelter 42 was to ensure that the electrostatic force and potential are consistent with each other, while remaining continuous at the interatomic cut-off distance.…”
Section: Structure and Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar patterns of inwards displacements have also been observed for screw dislocations in MgO, forsterite (Walker et al, 2005b) and zeolite A (Walker et al, 2004) and it appears that the explanation may be rather general. (Wolf et al, 1999), are truncated at a radius of 16.0Å and damped using an η parameter of 0.2Å −1 . Sawamoto et al (1984), Ahrens (1995, Kumazawa and Anderson (1969), and Zha et al (1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key difference in the formulation of the new model is that the Coulomb term is evaluated using a spherically truncated, pairwise, real space summation (Wolf et al, 1999). This allows calculations using the model to make use of physically intuitive and easily parallelizable spatial locality to realize linear scaling with system size (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 stipulates that the Ewald summation 22 should be used in the calculation of the total energy and forces. However, as shown by Wolf et al 23 in a recent communication, a pairwise sum can be constructed in real space by ensuring charge neutrality of the system such that the sum produces results very similar to that obtained from the Ewald summation. We have adopted this real-space approach to calculate the total energy and forces via Wolf's summation.…”
Section: Methodology: Basics Of Fesr and Its Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%