2002
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/35/50/301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ExactS-matrices for supersymmetric sigma models and the Potts model

Abstract: We study the algebraic formulation of exact factorizable S-matrices for integrable twodimensional field theories. We show that different formulations of the S-matrices for the Potts field theory are essentially equivalent, in the sense that they can be expressed in the same way as elements of the Temperley-Lieb algebra, in various representations. This enables us to construct the S-matrices for certain nonlinear sigma models that are invariant under the Lie "supersymmetry" algebras sl(m + n|n) (m = 1, 2, n > 0… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(The fusion index m should not be confused with the minimal model label m used above.) The explicit decomposition coefficients generalise results of [44,45] for (n, n)-fusion and their computation is deferred to Appendix A. Planar identities similar to the ones in the non-fused case are obtained for the fused faces. The generalisation of the boundary Yang-Baxter equation to the fused setting is nontrivial and a proof is presented in Appendix B, following ideas developed in [29].…”
Section: Lm(pmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(The fusion index m should not be confused with the minimal model label m used above.) The explicit decomposition coefficients generalise results of [44,45] for (n, n)-fusion and their computation is deferred to Appendix A. Planar identities similar to the ones in the non-fused case are obtained for the fused faces. The generalisation of the boundary Yang-Baxter equation to the fused setting is nontrivial and a proof is presented in Appendix B, following ideas developed in [29].…”
Section: Lm(pmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Along with the corresponding coefficients α 2,2 a , diagrams similar to (3.8) were introduced in [44] and later generalised to the n × n case in [45]. The (2, 2)-fused loop model and its conformal properties are investigated in [35].…”
Section: Fused Face Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the anyonic version, the truncated su(2) k representations play a central role. For a related discussion in the general context of loop models, we refer to 51,52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E i E i+1 E i = E i ) are straightforward to work out using the Temperley-Lieb algebra; they can be found for example in Ref. 42. Most become fairly obvious after drawing the appropriate picture.…”
Section: B the So(3) Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.4). 42,57,59,60 However, when Q is an integer (k = 2, 4, ∞), this S matrix is diagonal, so the braiding which follows from it is Abelian. For non-Abelian statistics, we need to use the Potts model for Q not an integer.…”
Section: B the So(3) Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%