Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2012
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973099.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Distance Oracles for Planar Graphs

Abstract: We present new and improved data structures that answer exact node-to-node distance queries in planar graphs. Such data structures are also known as distance oracles. For any directed planar graph on n nodes with non-negative lengths we obtain the following: 1• Given a desired space allocation S ∈ [n lg lg n, n 2 ], we show how to construct inÕ(S) time a data structure of size O(S) that answers distance queries inÕ(n/ √ S) time per query. The best distance oracles for planar graphs until the current work are d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many exact distance oracles for planar graphs have been proposed [13,20,31,35,65,78], mostly focusing on the tradeoff between space and query time, showing that with space s the query time can be madeÕ(n/ √ s) [62].…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many exact distance oracles for planar graphs have been proposed [13,20,31,35,65,78], mostly focusing on the tradeoff between space and query time, showing that with space s the query time can be madeÕ(n/ √ s) [62].…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the special case of planar graphs, we prove that there exists a decremental transitive closure algorithm with nearly-linear total update time and O( √ n) query time (Theorem 5.18). Consequently, using known techniques [28], we show a trade-off data structure with O(n 2 /t) total update time and O( √ t) query time (Theorem 6.6). Setting t = n 2/3 , we obtain a data structure with all operations running in amortized O(n 1/3 ) time, provided that all edges are eventually deleted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although our graphs are in fact of the form G * In this section we sketch how to obtain a decremental transitive closure algorithm for planar graphs with a faster query time, at a cost of a slower update time and larger space consumption. The method we use is due to Mozes and Sommer [28] who used it to develop the so-called cycle-MSSP data structure, which they subsequently leveraged to show a space-time trade-off for exact distance oracles for planar graphs. In the following, let t be a parameter.…”
Section: Initialization First We Compute the Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them utilize the property of spatial coherence, i.e., spatial positions of both source and destination nodes and the shortest paths between them that facilitate the aggregation of source and destination nodes into groups sharing common nodes or edges on the shortest paths between them. (2) Road networks are also often assumed to be planar graphs with non-negetive weights, and the properties of planar graphs are further utilized to simplify the search process [12], [16], [20], [28]. Moreover, (3) a (spatial) hierarchical index structure is used by several techniques [14], [30], [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%