2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10959-004-0584-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Asymptotics in log log Laws for Random Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easily seen that we extend the results of Gut and Spȃtaru [6] and Spȃtaru [10] to the Hilbert space setting.…”
Section: Remark 11ºsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is easily seen that we extend the results of Gut and Spȃtaru [6] and Spȃtaru [10] to the Hilbert space setting.…”
Section: Remark 11ºsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…After that, Gut and Spȃtaru [6] and Spȃtaru [10] considered the exact convergence rates for random fields, and Huang and Zhang [9] investigated the precise rates of the law of the logarithm in Hilbert space. Inspired by them, we aim to study the convergence rates of the law of the iterated logarithm for Hilbert-space-valued i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical method, as illustrated in Heyde [6], Spȃtaru [12], Gut and Spȃtaru [3], etc., proceeds with the assumption that X is in the domain of attraction of a stable law, and uses a version of the powerful Fuk-Nagaev inequality (see Spȃtaru [12]). This inequality is applicable only if the working condition has the form E |X| r < ∞ for some r. The second approach, introduced and practised by Gut and Spȃtaru [4], and Spȃtaru [13], is suitable for cases when Fuk-Nagaev type inequalities prove useless. It assumes existence of finite variance, and after the first step, it goes on via truncation and departure from normality.…”
Section: Aurel Spȃtarumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the Fuk-Nagaev inequality is inadequate, we make use of the second method. However, appealing to the Berry-Esseen inequality to estimate the error in the normal approximation, as in Gut and Spȃtaru [4], and Spȃtaru [13], does not suffice, so we need the non-uniform estimate of Nagaev (see, e.g., Petrov [8], p. 125). Nevertheless, since the factor n −1/2 in the Nagaev inequality (and in the Berry-Esseen inequality) is unimprovable, the case p ≥ 3/2 remains unsettled in general; cf.…”
Section: Aurel Spȃtarumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation