1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00034-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact and truncated computations of prime implicants of coherent and non-coherent fault trees within Aralia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…correlation between responses, correlation between capacities) could not considered by this method. The method using Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) 14 is one of the methods based on truth table.…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Conditional System Failure Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…correlation between responses, correlation between capacities) could not considered by this method. The method using Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) 14 is one of the methods based on truth table.…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Conditional System Failure Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the algorithms for fault tree generation used in FSAP, the minimisation routines used to extract the set of minimal cut sets are based on classical procedures for minimisation of Boolean functions, specifically on the implicit-search procedure described in [CM92,CM93,Rau93,RD97], based on BDDs [Bry92] (see also [RPA08] for enhanced methods to convert fault trees into BDDs). Alternative explicit-search and satisfiability based techniques for computation of prime implicants are described, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese operations extract knowledge from the information carried in the composition vectors and store this knowledge in the minimal possible schemes. e naming of these operations is aer Shannon's decomposition [11].…”
Section: Decomposition and Recomposition Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%