2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-020-00586-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact and heuristic algorithms for scheduling jobs with time windows on unrelated parallel machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make the problem more tractable, we propose a decomposition scheme in the spirit of logic-based and combinatorial Benders decomposition (Codato and Fischetti 2006;Hooker 2007), which has seen success dealing with difficult combinatorial optimization problems (e.g., Kress et al 2019;Tadumadze et al 2020;Fang et al 2021;Huang et al 2021). The general idea consists of splitting the original problem into a master and a slave component.…”
Section: Logic-based Benders Decomposition For the Picker Routing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the problem more tractable, we propose a decomposition scheme in the spirit of logic-based and combinatorial Benders decomposition (Codato and Fischetti 2006;Hooker 2007), which has seen success dealing with difficult combinatorial optimization problems (e.g., Kress et al 2019;Tadumadze et al 2020;Fang et al 2021;Huang et al 2021). The general idea consists of splitting the original problem into a master and a slave component.…”
Section: Logic-based Benders Decomposition For the Picker Routing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint enforces the set of jobs assigned to the machine with the largest portion in the objective value that must remove a job in the next iteration. Although we considered the cut mentioned in Tadumadze et al [47] to change the set of jobs assigned to every machine by removing a job, the numerical test reports that it does not perform better than the greedy cut (27). We want to point out that constraint (27) does not warrant an optimal solution as it does not consider the impact on the objective function value by removing a job from other machines, which potentially can lead to a better job-to-machine assignment.…”
Section: Proposition 2 Constraint (26) Is a Valid Benders Optimality Cutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ibility in solving a sub-problem, LBBD has been used to solve various complex combination optimization problems, including inventory location[52], home healthcare delivery[27], parallel machine scheduling[34,47,49], integrated process planning and scheduling[4], gantry crane scheduling[26] and so on. Furthermore, LBBD, as a decomposition framework, can be easily stretched using heuristics to solve its master problem or sub-problems.We keep the assignment decision in the master problem, and the sequence decision is left to the sub-problems for the problem in question.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the truck scheduling problem can be modeled as a parallel machine scheduling problem (Tadumadze et al 2019(Tadumadze et al , 2020. Thus, we generate arrival times and (un-)loading times of trucks similarly to the instance generation scheme proposed by Hall and Posner (2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%