2010 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy 2010
DOI: 10.1109/pecon.2010.5697580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact and efficient approach in static assessment of Available Transfer Capability (ATC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods based on RPF and CPF have been employed in literature for the determination of ATC . Ejebe et al formulated ATC problem based on CPF with adaptive localization which improved the speed in solving a large number of contingencies, giving a considerable reduction in computation time.…”
Section: Available Transfer Capability Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods based on RPF and CPF have been employed in literature for the determination of ATC . Ejebe et al formulated ATC problem based on CPF with adaptive localization which improved the speed in solving a large number of contingencies, giving a considerable reduction in computation time.…”
Section: Available Transfer Capability Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voltage limits, thermal limits, and generator limits are the constraints considered in the ATC determination, and the results are more accurate and very close (with an average error less than 0.5%) to the results from AC PF in comparison with DC PTDF and AC PTDF. An improved CPF using a generalized minimum residual method known as CPF‐GMRES method and expanded Newton Raphson‐Seydel (NRS) were evaluated in Eidiani et al The evaluation shows that the expanded NRS is reliable and faster compared with the modified CPF and conventional NRS. However, the techniques involve complex computations.…”
Section: Available Transfer Capability Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms based on the latter begin with static methods as their upper limits. The former includes continuation power flow (CPF) [26], Newton‐Raphson‐Seydel (NRS) method [27] and minimum distance (MD) methods [28]. DELF (differential equation load flow) is one of the new static methods [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be still improved using the general minimum residual method (GMRES) to speed up voltage stability computation 2,3 . Moreover, Newton‐Raphson‐Sidel (NRS) can substitute the usual Newton‐Raphson (NR) method for a more precise and rapid calculation of voltage stability and SATC 4‐6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%