4th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques (Cat. No.03EX699)
DOI: 10.1109/icatt.2003.1239161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact 'absorbing' conditions in initial boundary-value problems of the theory of pulse wave radiation

Abstract: The outcomes of a search for efficient and correct ways of the truncation of computational domain in finite-difference methods are presented. The relevant mathematical problem is resolved rigorously both for two-dimensional scalar model problems and for three-dimensional vector problems. In the framework of this abstract, we describe briefly only two typical two-dimensional situations. The peculiarities associated with a change to the analysis of three-dimensional vector problems are to be covered in the repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discretization of the EAC (18) on L 2 can be done in a similar way. In a conventional FDTD scheme, it is more convenient to discretize (15) for the amplitudes u n1 (z, t) and then use (2) to obtain boundary values of the total field U (ρ, −L 1 , t) rather than to discretize (16) directly. On L 1 the total field is a sum of the scattered field and the incident wave: U (ρ, z, t) = U s (ρ, z, t) + U i (ρ, z, t), and one should remember that (16) is formulated for the scattered field and the problem (45) is being solved for the total field.…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Fft-based Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The discretization of the EAC (18) on L 2 can be done in a similar way. In a conventional FDTD scheme, it is more convenient to discretize (15) for the amplitudes u n1 (z, t) and then use (2) to obtain boundary values of the total field U (ρ, −L 1 , t) rather than to discretize (16) directly. On L 1 the total field is a sum of the scattered field and the incident wave: U (ρ, z, t) = U s (ρ, z, t) + U i (ρ, z, t), and one should remember that (16) is formulated for the scattered field and the problem (45) is being solved for the total field.…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Fft-based Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T E 0n and T M 0n waves propagating in the axially symmetric waveguide unit and radiating to the outside satisfy [14,15]: Figure 1. Geometry of the model problems: (a) a waveguide cavity resonator fed and terminated by coaxial waveguides; (b) a parabolic radiator with elliptical subreflector and infinite flange.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations