2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0555-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex Vivo Gene Delivery to Hepatocytes: Techniques, Challenges, and Underlying Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data indicated that transfection efficiency was 29.3 ± 1.1% (Figure 1), which was close to previous study [14]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data indicated that transfection efficiency was 29.3 ± 1.1% (Figure 1), which was close to previous study [14]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first was to use a lentivirus expressing a myc-tagged SRSF3. We were able to produce this lentivirus in HEK-293T cells, but primary rat hepatocytes are exceptionally resistant to lentiviral infection ([38, 43] and data not shown). Another potential alternative we considered was to use an adeno-associated vector (AAV), but AAV systems also require splice-site switching [44] and thus we would likely encounter the same issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatocytes in primary culture recapitulate liver-specific traits better than cell lines or hepatomas; however, disadvantages to their use include their poor transfection efficiency and relatively short lifespan in culture (< 5 days) [38]. Adenoviral infection provides a mechanism to express proteins in > 95% of hepatocytes in as little as 24 h after infection, and can also be used in intact animals for liver-specific gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ex vivo culture of primary hepatocytes is challenging, the hepatocytes may not survive the genetic manipulation, and the engraftment of manipulated hepatocytes back in in vivo is also not optimal. 93 Another aspect to consider is the potential toxicity associated with the gene targeting. First of all, the different nuclease platforms may be seen by the immune system as foreign, as shown in vivo in mice.…”
Section: Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%