2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3910-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex vivo and in vivo diagnosis of C6 glioblastoma development by Raman spectroscopy coupled to a microprobe

Abstract: The potential of Raman spectroscopy for ex vivo and in vivo classification of normal and glioblastoma brain tumor development was investigated. High-quality spectra of normal and tumor tissues were obtained using a portable Raman spectrometer coupled to a microprobe with a signal integration time of 5 s. Ex vivo results demonstrated that by using the biochemical information contained in the spectra, we were able to distinguish between normal brain features (white and gray matter), invasion, and tumor tissues w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, projection of spectra from molecular species on a tissue spectrum is very sensitive to noise in the data. Typically, molecular characterization and quantification is performed with spectra acquired with integration times of ∼1 to 10 seconds, which can be challenging for clinical implementation [29][30][31]. Also, distinguishing between different tumor grades, which potentially relies on subtle spectral differences, might be achievable with higher SNR levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, projection of spectra from molecular species on a tissue spectrum is very sensitive to noise in the data. Typically, molecular characterization and quantification is performed with spectra acquired with integration times of ∼1 to 10 seconds, which can be challenging for clinical implementation [29][30][31]. Also, distinguishing between different tumor grades, which potentially relies on subtle spectral differences, might be achievable with higher SNR levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer detection system performance RS peaks were identified for lipids, nucleic acids, and cholesterol, as well as the three amide bands associated with the secondary structure of proteins (33,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The most significant biochemical differences between cancer and normal tissue were found, based on univariate statistical hypothesis testing of the individual RS peaks and tissue bands, as either increases (þ) or decreases (À) in cancer.…”
Section: Tissue and Spectral Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A glioblastoma Wistar rat model was used in this study, obtained after injecting a C6 glioma cell suspension into brain cortex, and sequential progression was monitored at days 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, and 20 post tumor injection. 21 Tanahashi et al compared spectra obtained from mouse models of avian sarcoma-based in¯ltrative glioma cells and tissues to spectra from normal mouse astrocytes and normal tissues and could distinguish the in¯l-trative tumors using RS. 22 …”
Section: Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%