2012
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex vivo activity of the ACT new components pyronaridine and piperaquine in comparison with conventional ACT drugs against isolates of Plasmodium falciparum

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of the present work was to assess i) ex vivo activity of pyronaridine (PND) and piperaquine (PPQ), as new components of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), to define susceptibility baseline, ii) their activities compared to other partner drugs, namely monodesethylamodiaquine (MDAQ), lumefantrine (LMF), mefloquine (MQ), artesunate (AS) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) against 181 Plasmodium falciparum isolates from African countries, India and Thailand, and iii) in vitro cross-resistance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(84 reference statements)
6
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, after several years of extensive use of artesunate plus amodiaquine and of artemether plus lumefantrine as first-line treatments for P. falciparum malaria in Niger, there is no evidence of a decline in sensitivity to artemisinin. Our data are similar to those reported in Senegal and Congo and are consistent with findings of studies indicating a lack of decrease in sensitivity to artesunate in Gabon, Senegal, and Djibouti despite the extensive and growing use of ACT in these regions (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). A decrease in parasite susceptibility to artemisinin derivatives has been reported to date only in Southeast Asia along the border between Thailand and Cambodia.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, after several years of extensive use of artesunate plus amodiaquine and of artemether plus lumefantrine as first-line treatments for P. falciparum malaria in Niger, there is no evidence of a decline in sensitivity to artemisinin. Our data are similar to those reported in Senegal and Congo and are consistent with findings of studies indicating a lack of decrease in sensitivity to artesunate in Gabon, Senegal, and Djibouti despite the extensive and growing use of ACT in these regions (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). A decrease in parasite susceptibility to artemisinin derivatives has been reported to date only in Southeast Asia along the border between Thailand and Cambodia.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…These data demonstrate that the ACT components PIP and PYD have excellent antimalarial activity against Nigerien isolates. These activities are broadly similar to those reported in Africa (12)(13)(14)18). In Niger, the first cases of CQ resistance in vitro were reported at the end of the 1980s.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…P. falciparum isolates were collected from hospitalized patients with imported malaria from a malaria-endemic Dama et al 7 country. A significant positive correlation was shown between responses to PQP and Pyr responses and between PQP and MDAQ (Pascual et al, 2012). Ex-vivo isotopic study of P. falciparum clinical isolates to artemisinin derivatives and partner drugs in Niger (Issaka et al, 2013) showed that GMIC 50 s were below the resistance threshold.…”
Section: Studies Assessing In Vitro and Ex-vivo Efficacy Methods Of Amentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Optical microtest was the first in vitro method widely used (Price et al, 2010;Tanariya et al, 2000). Standard in vitro and ex-vivo isotopic methods were developed initially for conventional antimalarial drugs but these methods were used to monitor ACTs partner drugs efficacy (Lim et al, 2010;Mwai et al, 2009;Pascual et al, 2012;Pradines et al, 1998Pradines et al, , 2011. Because of biosafety concerns with radioactive reagents, and the high cost of equipment and reagents, fluorometric and ELISA methods were developed to monitor ACTs partner drugs.…”
Section: In Vitro/ex-vivo Methods For Acts Efficacy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important difference between the ACT partner drugs and artemisinins is that the former act primarily against the early to mid trophozoite stages when hemoglobin degradation is at its peak, whereas artemisinins act against trophozoites as well as the early ring-stage parasites (53,54). For PND, studies with P. falciparum field isolates and culture-adapted lines show minimal crossresistance between this agent and the other ACT partner drugs, illustrating that resistance mechanisms that have evolved to drugs such as ADQ or the related 4-aminoquinoline chloroquine have not compromised PND efficacy (35,(55)(56)(57). These studies also show no evidence of significantly reduced activity against P. falciparum parasites that have acquired resistance to ADQ, chloroquine, or other related drugs.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%