2022
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex Vitro Rooting and Simultaneous Micrografting of the Walnut Hybrid Rootstock ‘Paradox’ (Juglans hindsi × Juglans regia) cl. ‘Vlach’

Abstract: In vitro micropropagation is already a current multiplication tool for walnut self-rooted cultivars and rootstocks, but walnut grafting is still performed in the field or in greenhouses, mainly using seedlings as rootstocks. The present work describes a new approach to obtain clonal walnut-grafted plants, involving in vitro shoot production of ‘Paradox’ (Juglans hindsi × Juglans regia) cl. ’Vlach’, to be used as rootstock, and J. regia cv. ‘Chandler’, to be used as scion. After completing the in vitro multipli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This stable in vitro environment and the probable pathogen-free status of micro-scion/rootstock may favor callus formation and rapid establishment of vascular reconnection between scions and rootstocks required for grafting success [34,35]. Micrografting protocols have been developed for many fruit crops including almond [18], apple [36], apricot [23], avocado [37], cacao [38], cashew [39], cherimoya [19], cherry [21], citrus [40,41], guava [4], grape [34], jujube [42], mulberry [43], hazelnut [44], kiwifruit [25], passion fruit [26], olive [45], peach [46], pear [47], pistachio [17], plum [48], walnut [49,50], and watermelon [51].…”
Section: Overall Developments and Characters Of Micrograftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stable in vitro environment and the probable pathogen-free status of micro-scion/rootstock may favor callus formation and rapid establishment of vascular reconnection between scions and rootstocks required for grafting success [34,35]. Micrografting protocols have been developed for many fruit crops including almond [18], apple [36], apricot [23], avocado [37], cacao [38], cashew [39], cherimoya [19], cherry [21], citrus [40,41], guava [4], grape [34], jujube [42], mulberry [43], hazelnut [44], kiwifruit [25], passion fruit [26], olive [45], peach [46], pear [47], pistachio [17], plum [48], walnut [49,50], and watermelon [51].…”
Section: Overall Developments and Characters Of Micrograftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several devices have been used to enable fast and effective union between the rootstock and scion, such as the elastic electric-wire tube [44], aluminum foil [66,76], Parafilm ® strip [42], silicon tube [13,79,80], paper bridge [59], silicone chip [30], plastic clamps [50] or alginate gel beads [44,75,81]. These grafting devices are used to support the graft and hold the scion and rootstock together during graft healing, particularly for the top-slit and top-wedge methods.…”
Section: Culture Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous rooting and acclimatization of in vitro-produced plantlets represent a promising and efficient approach to plant production [11]. This innovative technique offers several advantages, including a reduction in labor and time required for plantlet production, and therefore, lowered costs, as well as enhanced survival rates during the transfer to ex vitro conditions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the maturity and development of tissue culture technology, walnut micropropagation technology has been gained more attention and achieved tremendous progress in rootstock and cultivar propagation (Davis and Sankhla 1988;Gotea et al 2012;Leslie and McGranahan 1992;Liu et al 2018;Mc-Granahan et al 1987;McKenna and Sutter 1996;Payghamzadeh and Kazemitabar 2011;Pei et al 2007;Yegizbayeva et al 2021). Rootstock micropropagation for paradox cutting has been successful and used in commercial rootstock production (Ribeiro et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%